Solving the Work Needed to Move a Bowling Ball via Conservation of Momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the work done on a 5.5 kg bowling ball moved 2.0 m horizontally while hanging from a 5.0 m cable. The initial confusion involves understanding the relationship between the horizontal displacement and the potential energy change due to height. It is clarified that the ball's movement does not involve an arc, and the height change can be calculated using the Pythagorean theorem, resulting in a height change of approximately 0.417 m. The work done against gravity is then calculated as 22.5 J, which aligns with the work-energy theorem stating that the work done by external forces equals the negative work done by gravity. Overall, the key takeaway is the relationship between work, energy, and the forces acting on the bowling ball.
reallybanana
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm having a little bit of trouble trying to figure out how to solve this problem. I know it has to do with conservation of momentum, but I can't seem to get my first step on the problem.

The problem is as follows:

A bowling ball with a mass of 5.5kg hangs from the end of a 5.0m cable, initially such that the came is vertical. You push horizontally on the ball with a varying force to move it 2.0m to the side. During the ball's displacement how much work do you do on the ball? Assume that the ball is motionless before and after you push on it.

I have an idea, but I'm unsure if it's towards the right direction. Because we have a distance covered, we can some how figure out a velocity and then figure out our work or energy placed into the ball. I know the ball has no energy at all whatsoever because it is also assumed that the ball is on rest on the ground (asked my professor about this as well). Because there is no energy initially, we have to give it energy, and since we are assume that no energy is lost in the form of heat or what ever, our end energy is equal to the same energy we put in and vice versa. My only problem is how to get there in this problem.

I was thinking that since the ball is on a dedicated 5.0m cable, that if I push the ball 2.0m, the ball has to travel in an arc, however my professor told me that's wrong too. I'm quite stuck on this problem. If anyone could not give me the answer, but give me a hint as what to do instead, that would be great.

Thanks in advanced.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Working at the problem again, I was looking at different arcs how it relates to the 2.0m mentioned in the problem.

Doing some work, we know that I pushed the ball 2.0m in the x direction, and not the ball a total of 2m. Going from my initial idea dealing with arcs, 2.0m in the x direction would give us a change in height of about sqrt(21) or .417. Now placing this as the distance for potential energy mgy would give me about 22.5 J of work. Does this seem plasuable?
 
reallybanana said:
Working at the problem again, I was looking at different arcs how it relates to the 2.0m mentioned in the problem.

Doing some work, we know that I pushed the ball 2.0m in the x direction, and not the ball a total of 2m. Going from my initial idea dealing with arcs, 2.0m in the x direction would give us a change in height of about sqrt(21) or .417. Now placing this as the distance for potential energy mgy would give me about 22.5 J of work. Does this seem plasuable?
Yes, excellent 'work'. Since there is no change in the kinetic energy of the system, and since the tension force does no work, then the work done by you must equal the negative of the work done by gravity, since the net work done by all forces must be zero, per the work-energy theorem.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top