Solving Troublesome Integral: Quantum Mechanics Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter genxhis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the momentum space wave function from the given quantum mechanics problem involving the function Ψ(x,0) = A/(x^2 + a^2). The integral for the Fourier transform, Φ(p, 0), presents challenges due to singularities at x = ia and x = -ia, which require complex analysis techniques for evaluation. Users highlight that Mathematica provides a solution in terms of the Meijer G-function, but there is confusion regarding the necessity of complex analysis for understanding the singularities. The conversation emphasizes the importance of evaluating residues and choosing the correct contour for integration based on the sign of x. Overall, the thread underscores the complexity of the problem and the need for a solid grasp of complex analysis to resolve it effectively.
genxhis
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
A quantum mechanics problem calls for the reader to find the momentum space wave function of \Psi(x,0) = A/(x^2 + a^2). But I do not know how to resolve the Fourier transform:

\Phi(p, 0) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi \hbar}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-i p x/\hbar} \frac{A}{x^2+a^2}dx.​

The problem implies an exact solution can be found since it subsequantly asks you to check normalization and compute the expected values of p and p2 using the transformed fn. Mathematica evaluates the transform in terms of a special fn MeijerG.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The integral has singularities at x = ia and x = -ia. To evaluate the integral you need evaluate the residues resulting from closing the path either in the upper half plane (Im z > 0) or the lower half plane (Im x < 0) depending on the sign of x (i.e. with a semicircle whose radius approaches infinity).
 
Last edited:
Singularities? I don't understand. The integrand is well-defined for all real values x and the integral almost certainly exists over any range. Sorry, I have not had a course in complex analysis.
 
genxhis,

Sorry about that - I edited my original post to reflect the correct locations of the singularities.

I assumed you were familiar with complex analysis but, since you're not, what I said won't make sense to you. I'll have to think a bit about how to do it without invoking complex analysis.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top