Solving Vector Problems in Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrssmth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Vector
AI Thread Summary
Understanding vector problems in physics involves manipulating equations to isolate variables. To find A from equations like A + B = xi + yj and A - B = wi + zj, one can add the equations to yield 2A = (x + w)i + (y + z)j, leading to A = (1/2)[(x + w)i + (y + z)j]. For equations with coefficients, such as A + 2B = x1j + y1j and 2A - B = x2i + y2j, multiplying and adding equations can help isolate A or B. The key is to align the equations properly and apply addition or subtraction to eliminate the desired variable. Mastering these techniques is crucial for solving vector problems effectively in physics.
mrssmth
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
i just started physics and i missed the first day. I'm trying to do these vector problems but i can't quite understand it and my book isn't helping.

given that A+2B = x1j +y1j and 2A-B = x2i + y2j what is A?

given that A + B =x1i + y1j and A-B = x2i + y2j what is A?

given that A +B =x1i + y1j and A-B = x2i + y2j what is B?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
There's a bunch of people with these problems coming in today ... so having attended the class does not seem to have helped ;)

If you look at those equations, they are in pairs with A-B on one side and A+B on the other ... to get the A out, just add them. To get the B out, subtract them.

I'll show you:

Lets say A+B=xi+yj and A-B=wi+zj

then I can put v1= A+B and v2=A-B
then v1+v2 = (A+B)+(A-B) = (xi+yj)+(wi+zj) do you see now?v1+v2 = A+B+A-B = 2A = (x+w)i+(y+z)j

therefore A = (1/2)[(x+w)i+(y+z)j]
 
What we are doing is lining the relations up and adding the columns just like for a sum of two regular numbers.

<br /> \begin{array}{ccccccccc}<br /> &amp; A &amp; + &amp; B &amp; = &amp; x\hat{\imath} &amp; + &amp; y\hat{\jmath}&amp;\\<br /> +(&amp; A &amp; - &amp; B &amp; = &amp; w \hat{\imath}&amp; + &amp; z\hat{\jmath}&amp;)\\ \hline<br /> &amp; 2A &amp; &amp; &amp; = &amp; (x+w) \hat{\imath}&amp; + &amp; (y+z)\hat{\jmath}&amp;<br /> \end{array}<br />
 
That makes so much more sense!
Is this the right answer for "given that A + B =x1i + y1j and A-B = x2i + y2j what is A?"
I got A= (x1+x2)/2i +(y1+y2)/2j
 
Also for "A+2B = x1j +y1j and 2A-B = x2i + y2j what is A?" I got to this point and then got confused:

3A+B=(x1+x2)i +(y1+y2)j and now i don't know how to get the A all alone
 
When there is some constant multiplying the vector we want to get rid of, we have to add a multiple of the vectors together like this:

<br /> \begin{array}{rcccccccl}<br /> &amp; A &amp; + &amp; 2B &amp; = &amp; x\hat{\imath} &amp; + &amp; y\hat{\jmath}&amp;\\<br /> +2\times(&amp; 2A &amp; - &amp; B &amp; = &amp; w \hat{\imath}&amp; + &amp; z\hat{\jmath}&amp;)\\ \hline<br /> &amp; 5A &amp; &amp; &amp; = &amp; (x+2w) \hat{\imath}&amp; + &amp; (y+2z)\hat{\jmath}&amp;<br /> \end{array}<br />

notice how the +2x(... applies to the entire second row. I'm multiplying the second vector by 2 so that the second column will have a -2B in it.

You won't always be asked to find A, you may be asked to extract the B instead. In that case you have to subtract instead of add:

<br /> \begin{array}{rcccccccl}<br /> 2\times( &amp; A &amp; + &amp; 2B &amp; = &amp; x\hat{\imath} &amp; + &amp; y\hat{\jmath}&amp;)\\<br /> -(&amp; 2A &amp; - &amp; B &amp; = &amp; w \hat{\imath}&amp; + &amp; z\hat{\jmath}&amp;)\\ \hline<br /> &amp; &amp; &amp; 3B &amp; = &amp; (2x-w) \hat{\imath}&amp; + &amp; (2y-z)\hat{\jmath}&amp;<br /> \end{array}<br />

... in this case I multiplied the top row by 2 so the first column would be 2A-2A=0.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top