Solving Water Level Puzzle: Page 6 of 1902 Exam Solutions 2004

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
Please refer to page 6 of

http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/ugrad/jphys/jphys_webct/jp_exams/1902_exam_2004.pdf

I'm quoting from the solution guide:

http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/ugrad/jphys/jphys_webct/jp_exams/1902_exam_solutions_2004.pdf

P_1 = P_A + \rho g y_1 and P_2 = P_A + \rho g y_2

Hence

\Delta h = y_1 - y_2.

Is it just me or does this last step total nonsense? AIUI, y_1 and y_2 refer to the position of the water levels measured with respect to two different coordinate systems. So how is it justified to say \Delta h = y_1 - y_2? I drew a diagram and calculated the vertical separation between the water levels to be y_1 - y_2 + \frac{D_2 - D_1}{2}. Could someone please point out if I am missing something obvious.

Thanks.

James
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're only asked to calculate the height differences on the columns. That's pretty much just a fluid statics problem. The pressures are all you care about. When you ask how is it justified to say y_1 = y_2 just take a look at the fluid static FBD:

At column number 1, you have atmospheric pressure in equillibrium with the fluid static pressure at point one, or P_1 = P_a + \rho g y_1. At point 2, you have atmospheric pressure in equillibrium with the fluid's static pressure at point 2 or P_2 = P_a + \rho g y_2.

Since it is assumed incompressible and no local changes in g, then that means that the only thing that can change as P_1 amd P_2 change is y.

I guess the best thing would be for you to post how you came up with your answer and we can go from there.
 
Last edited:
The diagram is mislabeled. The delta h in the diagram is y_1 - y_2 + \frac{D_2 - D_1}{2}. The question makes sense as long as you "assume" that they actually want y_1 - y_2. Quite a silly question.
 
jdstokes said:
The diagram is mislabeled. The delta h in the diagram is y_1 - y_2 + \frac{D_2 - D_1}{2}. The question makes sense as long as you "assume" that they actually want y_1 - y_2. Quite a silly question.

You've lost me on that one. The \Delta h is the pressure drop across the venturi. \Delta h has to equal y_1 - y_2. How can they be different values? All that is done is to take the relationship derived for P_1 - P_2 = \frac{1}{2}\rho \Delta V^2 and replace the velocity terms with V = \frac{R}{A}

Show how you arrived at your conclusion. That would help.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top