Solving Wave Packet Spreading Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Jeans
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave Wave packet
Math Jeans
Messages
347
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So I already finished most of this problem, but I'm having trouble figuring out the very last part second part.

The last part of the problem is:
"Finally, take one additional term in the Taylor series expression of \omega(k) and show that \sigma is now replaced by a complex quantity. Find the expression of the 1/e width of the packet as a function of time for this case and show that the packet moves with the same group velocity as before but spreads in width as it moves. Illustrate this result with a sketch."

I found the complex quantity, and it is the second part I'm having issues with.


Homework Equations



The 1/e width is such that at k = k_0 \pm \frac{1}{\sqrt{\sigma}}, the amplitude distribution is 1/e of its maximum value A(k_0).
The 1/e width is defined as \frac{2}{\sqrt{\sigma}}.

The complex expression for \sigma is \sigma - \frac{1}{2}i\omega''_0 t

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, the implication of this is that:
\frac{2}{\sqrt{\sigma - \frac{1}{2}i\omega''_0 t}}

Since this is the 1/e width, I had thought that it should be increasing in order to imply spreading, however, when I graph the real component of this equation with respect to time, I always get a decreasing trajectory for t>0. Would this not imply that it is contracting?

Well, I then went ahead and graphed my wave equation, and I did get some spreading (in that the oscillations remained visible for a larger width, however, the width of each curve was the same, but this is fine due to non-variable frequency).

How do I get my expression for \sigma to correctly demonstrate the spreading effect?

thanks,
Jeans
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Math Jeans said:

Homework Statement



So I already finished most of this problem, but I'm having trouble figuring out the very last part second part.

The last part of the problem is:
Please also type out the entire question, so the reader has the correct context.
 
Gokul43201 said:
Please also type out the entire question, so the reader has the correct context.

Actually, you're timing is impeccable because I just figured it out.

The 1/e width refers to width in terms of wave number, so if spreading is in terms of the x-coordinate, then it will become larger as opposed to smaller.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top