Solving WKB Eigenvalue Problem for Bound States

T-7
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Hi,

This is just a quick question -- I'm puzzled by the way this answer sheet represents the potential function.

The question asks us to determine the energy eigenvalues of the bound states of a well where the potential drops abruptly from zero to a depth Vo at x=0, and then increases linearly with position x until at x=a the potential is again zero.

They write:

V(x) = \frac{V_{0}x}{a}
E = V(b) = \frac{V_{0}b}{a}

where b is some point between x=0 and x=a.

But surely the correct representation of the potential function is

V(x) = V_{0}\left(\frac{x}{a}-1\right)

so that V(0) = -Vo, and V(a) = 0. But, using my potential function, I end up with a somewhat different expression for the energy eigenvalues, in the end, than they do. Why do they do it that way? And what's wrong with my pot. function??

Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's nothing wrong with your function; if your description of the problem is a faithful reproduction (which is why we prefer if the original question is reproduced verbatim, rather than paraphrased) then "they" got it wrong.
 
Gokul43201 said:
There's nothing wrong with your function; if your description of the problem is a faithful reproduction (which is why we prefer if the original question is reproduced verbatim, rather than paraphrased) then "they" got it wrong.

Ok. Thanks for confirming that.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top