Solving x^y=y^x & x+y=6 with Deduction

  • Thread starter Thread starter arka.sharma
  • Start date Start date
arka.sharma
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I was given two equations back in my school days to solve for both x and y it is as follows

x^y = y^x & x+y = 6

Now it can be seen that following would be possible solutions (x=4,y=2),(x=3,y=3),(x=2,y=4).
But is there any deductive way to solve this ?

Regards,
Arka
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Solving (6-y)^y == y^(6-y)
Which can be represented graphically.
 
Thanks for your reply. But how to solve the equation (6-y)^y == y^(6-y) ?
 
Put the RHS and the LHS of the equation on a graphic and see where these curve cut each other.
You will find the root that you already know.
If there are other roots, you will likely find out.
Afterward, you might find out arguments to "prove" you found all the roots.
The graphical representation will help a lot.
 
arka.sharma said:
Thanks for your reply. But how to solve the equation (6-y)^y == y^(6-y) ?
You were told to solve it graphically. It can also be solved using a numerical iteration method. If you are looking for an elementary algebraic way of solving it, there is none.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top