Solving z*exp(z)=a: Proving Infinitely Many Roots

  • Thread starter Thread starter bndnchrs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots
bndnchrs
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
This is not a homework problem, it is something that is stumping a group of us right now.

Show that

z*exp(z) = a

Has infinitely many roots in the complex plane.

I would caution against a series approach as we can't guarantee roots of the polynomial
z*exp(z) - a.

Any ideas?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Heya,

What is a? Either way, this is off the top of my head but you could try doing it via norms of a ring which would prehaps reduce it to an equation in the integers. I haven't even stopped to see if it will work but it is an idea :)

The Bob
 
Write out z as x + iy and don't you soon see there are infinitely many values for which the real part of both sides is equal and infinitely many for which the imaginary part of both sides is equal, proving more than what you are asked?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top