Something about the property of the integral bother mes

  • Thread starter Thread starter flyingpig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Property
flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



\int_{0}^{\infty } e^-^x dx = -\frac{1}{e^x} \Biggr|_0^\infty = 0 + 1 = 1

Notice that I abused \frac{1}{\infty} = 0.

My question is, when we compute integrals, why do we ignore the fact that \frac{1}{\infty} = 0 is not a limit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A proper way to do this is:

\int_{0}^{\infty } e^{-x}\,dx

=\lim_{t\to\infty}\ \int_{0}^{\,t} e^{-x}\,dx
 
But in most cases, we just throw it out. We don't even care about the limit anymore.
 
But we have matured, & we (A·S·S-U-ME) that we know what we mean by 1/∞ =0. (even when we don;t!) LOL!

Keep up the questioning! -even if you frustrate me & others. You're obviously trying to figure this stuff out !
 
Last edited:
well an integral from x to infinity is not really a "riemann integral", it is a limiting process of riemann integrals
 
Technically speaking, you can't really throw it out. What SammyS said is the definition of the improper integral.

e^infinity isn't a specific number, so you can't plug in infinity to the primitive. If you don't write it down that's one thing (still a bad habit, though), as long as you understand that that is still what's going on.

For instance,if the problem is finding the integral of (1/x)dx from 0 to 1. You can't just plug 0 into the primitive because 1/(0^2) isn't defined as a number (1/0 doesn't equal infinity. however, we can make 1/x as large as we possibly want by making x sufficiently close to 0, so we say the limit of this approaches infinity); you have to take the limit.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top