Something I should really know by now

  • Thread starter Thread starter joex444
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mathematical equality e^{n^2} = (e^n)^n, which is confirmed as correct. A participant reflects on a recent calculus test where this equation was part of a series convergence problem. They mention that another student used an integral to arrive at the same conclusion of convergence. The conversation highlights the importance of verifying mathematical identities through substitution and the utility of calculators for confirming results. Overall, the exchange emphasizes the need to remember fundamental algebraic rules in calculus.
joex444
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Idk if this is right
e^{n^2} = (e^n)^n
Atleast I didn't think e^{n^2} = e^n*e^n

I had a test in calc 3 today, and that was part of a series. If it is equal (in the first equation) then I did it right, otherwise not. I came up with convergent, and someone else said they used an integral and got convergent, so...my answer hinges on that, which i should really know by now :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, a^{b^c} \ne a^{bc}.
(a^b)^c = a^{bc}
You should be able to show this yourself. Your first equality is correct.
 
Well, when in doubt just substitute some numbers! I don't understand why people don't do this more often when in doubt.

Like pretend e=2 and that n=3

2^9=(2^3)^3

we all know 2^9=512 and 2^3=8
8^3=512
so it worksNow, this is aside from the fact that this is a basic algebraic rule...
 
yea, lol, i just typed in ({e^n})^n into my calculator and it spit back e^{n^2}... it's a ti-89.

sometimes you just forget the basic stuff...
 
In that case, it's good to have a calculator that is smarter than you are!
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top