Sommerfeld quantisation:relation between energy and potential

  • Thread starter Thread starter krishna mohan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Potential
krishna mohan
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
I found the following question in a question paper.

If the potential experienced by a particle in one dimension is given by ax^4, how does the energy of the particle depend on the parameter a? Use Bohr-Sommerfeld quantisation formula.. I know how to find the dependence of energy on n, the integer that occurs in the quantisation.

But how does it depend on a?

Since
Hamiltonian is \ K+V ,
Energy is \ K+ax^4.

I don't know what else I can say.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For example, in the harmonic oscillator, the potential V is,
V = ax^2 = \frac{1}{2}m \omega^{2}x^2
So, the total energy is,
E= K+V = \frac{p_{x}^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}m \omega^{2}x^2(=ax^2)

As shown in this thread, The Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization formula is, (in a quarter period)
\oint p_{x}dx = nh \to \sqrt{2m}\int_{0}^{\sqrt{\frac{E}{a}}}\sqrt{E-ax^2}dx = \frac{1}{4}nh

change the variable to \theta as follows,
\sqrt{\frac{a}{E}}x=sin\theta, \quad E\sqrt{\frac{2m}{a}}\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}cos^2\theta d\theta =\frac{\sqrt{2m}E\pi}{4\sqrt{a}}=\frac{1}{4}nh

So if we erase the a, the the total energy E is,
E=\frac{nh\sqrt{a}}{\sqrt{2m}\pi}=\frac{nh\omega}{2\pi}=n\hbar\omega

This result shows the interval of the energy E is \hbar\omega

But as shown in the ground state electron of the Bohr hydrogen model, the electron has the orbital angular momentum 1 (x \hbar) instead of the spin 1/2. So we have to consider the minimum rotation (not 1-D) in the Bohr model.

This magnetic moment which can be measured by the experiment is the same as the QM hydrogen model because the magnetic moments(angular momentum x g-factor) are 1 x 1 (in the Bor model) = 1/2 x 2 (in the QM model).
If the angular momentum is \hbar, the electron naturally return by one rotation as follows, (also in the result of this experiment)

L_{z}(=-i\hbar\frac{d}{d\varphi})\phi_{m}(\varphi) = m\hbar\phi_{m}(\varphi), \to \quad \phi_{m}(\varphi)=e^{im\varphi}

Sorry, the case of V=ax^4 is a little complicated, so I'm glad if you calculate like this, and tell me the result.
 
My question was not about the dependence on the quantum number n obtained from the quantisation condition...

It was about the dependence of the energy on the parameter a in the Hamiltonian..that is the potential energy being given as a x^4...



As for dependence on n, it can be easily accomplished..see this video...at around the thirty minute mark...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...

Similar threads

Back
Top