Sound and air movement: do they affect each other?

AI Thread Summary
Sound can travel behind a speaker due to diffraction and the non-point source nature of the human voice, which allows sound waves to disperse in various directions. Even in open spaces, reflections and the acoustic properties of the speaker's anatomy contribute to sound reaching listeners positioned behind them. Compressed air flow in front of a speaker may disrupt sound transmission, as it alters air pressure and potentially randomizes air molecule motion, affecting sound clarity. However, the impact of such air movement on sound detection is complex and not fully understood. Overall, sound and air movement are interrelated, influencing how sound is perceived in different environments.
fisico30
Messages
362
Reaction score
0
Hello Forum.

I have two basic sound questions:

I know sound (large wavelength) diffracts a lot when it exits an aperture. But if someone is speaking and he/she is not facing us we still hear them, even if we are in an empty field.
Does sound diffract so much that it ends up even behind us?

2. If we created a flow of compressed air in front of a speaker playing some music, would the receiving microphone simply detect the noise from the compressed air or would the compressed air disrupt the air molecule behavior (sound coming out of the speakers) and change it?
After all, sound is simply compressions and rarefactions of air density, i.e. molecules that bump into each other...
If we push some air in front of the microphone we should be able to randomize the air molecules motion and not here the music...

thanks,
fisico30
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sound can get carried by air movement.

You can hear this on a windy day if you walk around someone speaking.

I'm not sure that all the sound you hear behind someone speaking in still air is the result of diffraction alone. The human voice is not a single point source.

If we created a flow of compressed air in front of a speaker playing some music

Flowing air has a lower pressure than still air. So if you blow air at or across the speaker it will experience a lower pressure than if you didn't.
 
Well, when someone speaks the aperture is his/her mouth. It would seem that sound would move forward, in a hemispherical region of space...but not be present in region behind the the person speaking...
Reflections have an effect, but if we are in the middle of a football field we still hear a person's voice even if they are not facing us...How do air molecules get to vibrate behind the person speaking?
 
If you look at the acoustic radiation pattern of many chamber type sources you will see the characteristic 'doublet pattern' (figure of eight).

Don't forget that the back of the head/throat/chest is not a very good acoustic barrier.
 
fisico30 said:
Well, when someone speaks the aperture is his/her mouth. It would seem that sound would move forward, in a hemispherical region of space...but not be present in region behind the the person speaking...
Reflections have an effect, but if we are in the middle of a football field we still hear a person's voice even if they are not facing us...How do air molecules get to vibrate behind the person speaking?

Sound emitted by a point source (not exactly someone's mouth, but similiar) the sound energy spreads shperically...that is, in all directions.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top