Sound in a gas of non-interacting particles?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of sound in a gas of non-interacting particles, specifically within the context of statistical mechanics and thermodynamics. It establishes that while particles in an ideal gas are treated as non-interacting, they still collide, allowing for the exchange of momentum and energy, which is essential for sound propagation. The Hamiltonian framework used in the canonical ensemble is purely kinetic, and the relaxation time is critical for understanding how perturbations in density relate to sound speed. Ultimately, the discussion concludes that sound transmission is feasible in an ideal gas, provided small perturbations are considered.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of statistical mechanics, particularly the canonical ensemble.
  • Familiarity with the ideal gas law and thermodynamic relations.
  • Knowledge of kinetic theory, including concepts like mean free path and relaxation time.
  • Basic grasp of hydrodynamics and linear-response theory.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Boltzmann equation as outlined in Landau and Lifshitz.
  • Explore the relationship between particle-number density and sound speed in ideal gases.
  • Investigate the implications of collision cross-section on sound damping in gases.
  • Learn about linear-response theory and its application to sound propagation in non-equilibrium systems.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, and fluid dynamics, as well as students and researchers interested in the behavior of gases and sound propagation in non-interacting systems.

greypilgrim
Messages
581
Reaction score
44
Hi.

In some statistical approaches (e.g. canonical ensemble), the particles of an ideal gas are non-interacting. Still, it's possible to derive the ideal gas law and other thermodynamic relations.

Wikipedia gives an equation for the speed of sound in an ideal gas. How can there be waves in a medium of non-interacting components?

Or do statistical approaches not apply here because we have no thermal equilibrium and we need a kinetic approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The particles in an ideal gas interact when they collide and exchange momentum and energy.
Without collisions there will be no thermal equilibrium.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Generally, when assuming the particles are non-interacting, this doesn't discount collisions. It just means they are being treated as essentially rigid spherical particles that collide but don't repel or attract each other.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Delta2
greypilgrim said:
the particles of an ideal gas are non-interacting
Non-interacting means that behave independent from one another, and exchange momentum only upon collision.

At the top of the wiki,
Generally, a gas behaves more like an ideal gas at higher temperature and lower pressure,[1] as the potential energy due to intermolecular forces becomes less significant compared with the particles' kinetic energy, and the size of the molecules becomes less significant compared to the empty space between them
.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
nasu said:
The particles in an ideal gas interact when they collide and exchange momentum and energy.
Without collisions there will be no thermal equilibrium.
boneh3ad said:
Generally, when assuming the particles are non-interacting, this doesn't discount collisions. It just means they are being treated as essentially rigid spherical particles that collide but don't repel or attract each other.
256bits said:
Non-interacting means that behave independent from one another, and exchange momentum only upon collision.

But the Hamiltonian used to derive all thermodynamics in the canonical ensemble is purely kinetic:
$$H\left(\left\{\mathbf{q}_i\right\},\left\{\mathbf{p}_i\right\}\right)=\sum_i \frac{\mathbf{p}^2_i}{2m}$$
It's separable, there is no interaction at all.
 
Check vol. X of Landau and Lifshitz, where the Boltzmann equation is derived. Then you'll see, how this comes about: The particles are assumed to move almost always freely and that only from time to time collisions occur, i.e., the mean free path of the particles is assumed to be much smaller than the interaction range. The relaxation time, i.e., the time scale upon which small perturbations of the gas from equilibrium relaxes to equilibrium is parametrically given by
$$\tau_{\text{eq}} \sim \frac{1}{n v_{\text{rel}} \sigma},$$
where ##n## is the particle-number density, ##v_{\text{rel}}## the average relative velocity between the particles, and ##\sigma## the (elastic) scattering cross section for ##2 \rightarrow 2## collisions.

The gas is the better described by hydrodynamics (i.e., local thermal equibrium) the smaller ##\tau_{\text{eq}}## is. So a gas is the better a perfect fluid the larger the cross section is!
 
So my assumptions from the start is correct that one needs to take a kinetic approach and the ideal gas as modeled in the canonical ensemble is not capable of transmitting sound?
 
Sure it is. You have to consider a small perturbation (in density in this case) to get the speed of sound (linear-response theory).
 
Does it mean that, on the limit as the collision cross-section shrinks to zero, sound becomes impossible as the damping of sound diverges?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
79K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K