Source free RL circuit confusion When this switch closes, does the current end?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the behavior of a RL circuit when a switch is opened after being closed for a long time. The confusion arises from the assumption that the inductor acts as a short circuit when the switch is closed, leading to questions about the current distribution through other resistors in the circuit. It is clarified that while the 10 and 20 ohm resistors do not disappear, the voltage across the 50 ohm resistor is sufficient to determine the current without needing to calculate the current through the other resistors. The key takeaway is that the potential difference across the resistors allows for simplification in analyzing the circuit. This explanation resolves the initial confusion regarding the current paths in the circuit.
mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone. I'm getting confused on what my professor did. Everything else makes sense to me but this one part. THe directions say:
Aftering having been closed for a long time, the switch in the circuit is opened at t= 0. (a) find IL(t) for t>0, (b) Evaluate IL(10ms).

I got both parts right. Here is my work and the circuit:
http://img119.imageshack.us/img119/7361/lastscan2at.jpg


Okay if you look at t<0, you assume the inductor is short circuit, that's what those 2 little dots mean instead of the curly inductor symbol. THe current Io = IL. So when the switch is closed, if you notice the circuit is redrawn, with the 20 and 10 resistors in series not even in the circuit. When that switch is closed for along time, its DC current. But wouldn't the current branch off into 2 parts? 1 going into the 20 + 10 resistors on the left and another current going to the right through the 50 ohm resistor and then going into where the inductor was?

What I'm confused on is why U can just say screw those other resistors, Io isn't affected by them. Any explanation? Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
mr_coffee said:
Hello everyone. I'm getting confused on what my professor did. Everything else makes sense to me but this one part. THe directions say:
Aftering having been closed for a long time, the switch in the circuit is opened at t= 0. (a) find IL(t) for t>0, (b) Evaluate IL(10ms).

I got both parts right. Here is my work and the circuit:
http://img119.imageshack.us/img119/7361/lastscan2at.jpg


Okay if you look at t<0, you assume the inductor is short circuit, that's what those 2 little dots mean instead of the curly inductor symbol. THe current Io = IL. So when the switch is closed, if you notice the circuit is redrawn, with the 20 and 10 resistors in series not even in the circuit. When that switch is closed for along time, its DC current. But wouldn't the current branch off into 2 parts? 1 going into the 20 + 10 resistors on the left and another current going to the right through the 50 ohm resistor and then going into where the inductor was?

What I'm confused on is why U can just say screw those other resistors, Io isn't affected by them. Any explanation? Thanks!

It`s not that the 10 and 20 ohms disappear. It is simply that the potential difference across the 50 ohms is 100 V (and the potential difference across the 10 and 20 ohms combined is also 100 volts). Do you see this? (it`s clear since the terminals of the battery are directly connected across the 50 ohms). So if you only want the current across the 50 ohms, you simply divide 100V by 50 ohms. However, at the same time, the current through the other two resistors is 100V/30 ohms = 3.33 A. But you did not need that information to proceed so there was no need to calculate it.

Hope this helps

Pat
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ahhh i c now! thanks Pat, helped alot!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top