Space Elevator Vehicle: Acceleration After Cable Release

AI Thread Summary
A space elevator vehicle traveling at high velocity will continue to slow down after it releases from the cable due to the conversion of kinetic energy into potential energy as it ascends. Although it never fully escapes Earth's gravity, the gravitational pull weakens with distance, resulting in a diminishing rate of deceleration. The concept of escape velocity is crucial, as it defines the speed needed to retain kinetic energy at an infinite distance from Earth. As the vehicle gains altitude, the energy required for each additional meter decreases, leading to a gradual reduction in speed. This discussion highlights the complexities of gravitational effects on objects moving away from Earth.
nuclear tan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Say you have a space elevator 47000 km* long (well past the point where centripetal acceleration cancels out gravity)

There is a vehicle traveling up the cable with a pretty high velocity, and instead of braking it just shoots off the top. (assume the counter weight allows this)

At the instant the vehicle leaves the cable, itwould be traveling at the magnitude of the normal and tangential velocity... I think.

Would it slow as it escapes Earth's gravity, or has that already been taking care of?


Now I apologize if this is the wrong forum.

This isn't homework, it's just something I have been thinking about.


*fyi I read about this enormous length in a NASA pdf...
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Space elevators are very interesting. Could you post a link to the NASA pdf?

Thanks
Matt
 
nuclear tan said:
Would it slow as it escapes Earth's gravity, or has that already been taking care of?
Yes it will continue to slow down.
Every metre higher it gets it gains potential energy - it must pay for this with kinetic energy by reducing it's speed.
As it gets further away the extra energy in going each metre is less (because Earth's gravity is progressively weaker) so the amount of slowing down is less with each metre.

It never leaves Earth's gravity - there is no limit to gravity (it goes on forever) but eventually it reaches a distance where the gravity is so weak that there is very little difference in potential energy at each extra metre and so the rate of deceleration goes to almost zero.

Escape velocity is the speed you would need to start at so that when you got an infinite distance from Earth you would still have some kinetic energy (and hence speed) left.
 
mgb_phys said:
Yes it will continue to slow down.
Every metre higher it gets it gains potential energy - it must pay for this with kinetic energy by reducing it's speed.
As it gets further away the extra energy in going each metre is less (because Earth's gravity is progressively weaker) so the amount of slowing down is less with each metre.

It never leaves Earth's gravity - there is no limit to gravity (it goes on forever) but eventually it reaches a distance where the gravity is so weak that there is very little difference in potential energy at each extra metre and so the rate of deceleration goes to almost zero.

Escape velocity is the speed you would need to start at so that when you got an infinite distance from Earth you would still have some kinetic energy (and hence speed) left.

Ha! Thank you.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top