Space Elevator - Your take on an exam question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a second-year dynamics exam question about a Space Elevator, which involves calculating the total acceleration of a craft using a nanotube structure and Earth's rotation. The exam question requires understanding the motion described by a specific equation and emphasizes the importance of using polar coordinates for easier calculations. There is a divergence in interpretation between the student and the instructor regarding the correct approach to the problem. Participants are encouraged to share their insights to clarify the concepts involved. The conversation aims to enhance understanding of dynamics in the context of innovative engineering solutions like the Space Elevator.
Stevecgz
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
I recently had an exam in my 2nd year dynamics course that included a question concerning a Space Elevator. My view on this question (or the answer to this question) seems to be different than my instructor's. I was hoping to get some of your thoughts so I could get a better understanding.

The question on the exam was exactly as follows:

"The 'Space Elevator'. Should you decide to poke around www.howstuffworks.com, you will eventually stumble across this masterpiece. The basic idea is to build a very large nanotube steel structure several kilometers straight up from the surface of the earth, and use conventional propulsion to accelerate the craft along the rail, while utilizing the rotation of the Earth to impart a rotational acceleration on the craft as well, thus increasing the total amount of available acceleration. Assuming that convention propellant moves it along the rail according to the equation r(t) = 3t^2 + 40*10^6 m, and that the Earth completes one rotation in 24 hours, determine the total acceleration on the craft imparted by the propulsion system after 60 seconds."


Thanks,
Steven
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can write the position of the craft in cartesian coordinates (messy) or in polar coordinates (much easier) and take the derivatives to find velocity and acceleration. But you have to be careful. In polar coordinates the unit vectors in the radial direction and the tangential direction are functions of time.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top