mfb said:
Very lucky, I don't think the loss of the equipment would have been that big of a deal overall, the debris field on the other hand would add to a very real issue that is going to need dealt with sooner rather than later. I noticed Japan recently launched an experimental debris removal mission, I would imagine about the time popular orbits are too cluttered to be usable, the commercial field of "Orbital Cleanup" will become big business. (the CubeSats etc. in LEO tend to not be much of a long term problem, however the craft in the 500 to 800 km orbits can take decades to reenter and their debris fields can be rather extensive from what I read).
mfb said:
44% collision risks means they could predict the orbit at least with meter- and millisecond-sized accuracy a day ahead - quite impressive.
True, that's some impressive math. I looked into it a bit and came across this.
A little dated but this is interesting reading on the subject. (I love a creative acronym).
http://celestrak.com/SOCRATES/AIAA-03-548.pdf
http://celestrak.com/SOCRATES/
From,
http://spaceflight101.com/close-orbital-encounter-january-7-2017/
"Due to errors in orbit determination and external influences on a satellite’s orbit, it can not be predicted with absolute certainty that the satellites will indeed collide. A 44% probability is considered very high - almost even odds of a collision taking place. Satellite operators typically track conjunctions starting at a 1/1000 probability of collision".
mfb said:
Based on the previous run, LIGO should detect a few more events in this run: It is a bit more sensitive now, and the run is longer. Adding Virgo would improve the sensitivity a lot.

I believe the Livingston detector began "O2" with a 25% increase in sensitivity (I need to confirm this). Next upgrade is scheduled for Hanford and Virgo is new to me, any idea if it will feature upgrades or improvements based on the current observatories ?.Here is an excellent article on the Lucy/Psyche mission, it appears the Psyche aspect is scheduled for a nominal observation period of one year, not unlike the Ceres mission. (If asteroid Psyche lives up to it's expectations it would be one of the best "Nuggets" in the solar system to an outfit such as Space Resources).
http://www.planetary.org/blogs/guest-blogs/van-kane/20170109-lucy-and-psyche-asteroid-missions.html
"Last week, Santa in the guise of NASA managers brought the solar system small bodies science community a sack full of belated Christmas presents. The Venus science community was unfortunately left with no presents under the tree".In the world of smaller commercial launch systems, the Electron has been scheduled for a test flight in the first half of 2017. Originally set for late December of 2016, this will be worth watching, very cool engineering. The launch site is another huge advantage, apparently the location is prime for rapid turn around with up to one launch per week.
I wish the writer wouldn't use the phrase "battery-powered" Rocket, I think "Hybrid" would be more appropriate.
http://spaceflight101.com/spacerockets/electron/
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11432396
This is a new startup I hadn't heard of, I think "Reusable" is going to be very popular in the future.
http://spacenews.com/spains-gmv-takes-a-stake-in-pld-spaces-reusable-rocket-quest/
Then of course this dovetails nicely with the subject, not exactly commercial but the technology is relevant.
http://spaceflight101.com/ss-520-4-smallest-orbital-rocket-set-for-launch/
"Japan plans to launch the smallest orbital space launch vehicle ever flown on Tuesday, lifting into orbit a tiny satellite of only 3 Kilograms. The launch of the SS-520-4 modified sounding rocket is planned at 23:48 UTC from the Uchinoura Space Center and will carry into orbit the TRICOM-1 CubeSat, dedicated to Earth-imaging and store-and-forward communications".