Spacetime in Newtonian kinematics

jcsd
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
13
I've just had a silly thought. Newtonian spacetime wrt to postion space is basically a vector bundle.

If you want to assign each postion vector to a point in on a Riemannian/Pseudo-Riemannian manifold you have to take the following two things into account:

a) Each vector in any given vector space in the bundle can be idenitifeid another vector in any given vector space in the bundle so you need a geometry that is flat

b) The metric should reduce to the metrics on postion space and time when appropiate.

This only allows E4 or M4.Though in Newtonian kinematics there is no way to make sense of the extra structure, I find it interesting that Newtonian kinematics can limit your choice to two spaces, one of which is the correct space to use for special relativity (even if in general relativity a) should be disregarded and b) is not really ture).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This thread is partly the product of a little alcohol, but does anyone agree with me that there are only two (psuedo) Riemannian manifolds were you can get Newtonian kinetmatics in the limit of when a) and b) (which seem sensible proscriptions in the context of Newtonian kienmatics)?
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top