Spacing between slits in a diffraction grating w/o known wavelength

AI Thread Summary
Finding the distance between the slits in a diffraction grating is challenging without the wavelength of the light source. The equations X~m(lambda)L/d and dsin(theta) = m(lambda) are applicable, but the absence of wavelength complicates the calculations. Measuring the angle from the normal to the first maxima could help, but it still leaves two unknowns. Using white light can provide a range of wavelengths, which may assist in estimating the slit distance. Ultimately, the problem highlights the necessity of knowing the wavelength to solve for the slit spacing accurately.
chanderson
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have an issue for a question I have. The problem is that I need to find the distance between the slits of a diffraction grating. Normally this would be pretty simple, but I'm not given the wavelength of the light source we're supposed to use to find it out.

Homework Equations



I know X~m(lambda)L / d and X = Ltan(theta) but this is difficult to figure out without the wavelength. I also know that dsin(theta) = m(lambda) but if I substitute that into the inital equation it eliminates d altogether.

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that if given the wavelength I could easily find d by using the initial equation and several simple measurments. I could also use the more accurate Ltan(theta) and measure the angle from the normal to the first maxima. I could set it up by setting the grating a certain distance from a blank wall and shine the light source through it, but without the wavelength I end up with two unknowns so I'm pretty much stuck.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Illuminate the slit with white light. You know the limit wavelengths of the visible range.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top