Spatial linewidth and density matrix

KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
Hi there,
I am thinking an interesting problem of spatial linewidth of two-level system. Suppose in some way I find out an element of the desinty matrix for the upper state of two-level system, \rho_{ee} and it turns out that \rho_{ee} is a function of a parameter G, which could be space dependent, i.e.

\rho_{ee} = \rho_{ee}(G(x))

as we know, \rho_{ee} tells the inversed population of the system, when the atoms jump back to ground state from excited state, one line will be observed. Now, suppose I choose G(x) to be a specific function, e.g. Gaussian, such that \rho_{ee}(G(x)) turns out to be somewhat localized around x=0, so what can I tell about the linewidth of the emitted light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The line width is related to the lifetime of the excited state, hence will depend on the details of the coupling between the excited and the ground state in the Hamiltonian. Simply knowing about the excited state is completely insufficient.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
59
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top