Special relativity and rest mass of a photon

Lizwi
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
1) How can get work done on a photon because work done = kinetic energy it depends on mass, but the rest mass of a photon is zero
2) From this equation E=PC , does this mean E of a photon is 0 because P must be zero since it depends on mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lizwi said:
1) How can get work done on a photon because work done = kinetic energy it depends on mass, but the rest mass of a photon is zero
2) From this equation E=PC , does this mean E of a photon is 0 because P must be zero since it depends on mass?

Remember that classical mechanics does not work for things moving at the speed of light. You need to use special relativity instead. Just because something has zero mass doesn't mean that its momentum needs to be zero.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larmor_formula

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham-Lorentz_force

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac_force#Abraham.E2.80.93Lorentz.E2.80.93Dirac_Forcehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electr...stored_in_an_electrostatic_field_distribution

121ffb796bb69c4862708c38d8bdb93b.png
 
Lizwi said:
1) How can get work done on a photon because work done = kinetic energy it depends on mass, but the rest mass of a photon is zero
2) From this equation E=PC , does this mean E of a photon is 0 because P must be zero since it depends on mass?

Hi Liziwi,

The equation for finding the energy of a photon is
E= \frac{\hbar c}{\lambda }
Where E is energy, {\hbar } is Planck's constant, c is the speed of light, and {\lambda } is the wavelength of the light.
Also, because E=mc2, an observer in relative motion with a photon will perceive it as having relative mass.
 
Mark M said:
Also, because E=mc2, an observer in relative motion with a photon will perceive it as having relative mass.

Really? What experiment does he employ to perceive this "mass" of a photon?
 
Mark M said:
... an observer in relative motion with a photon will perceive it as having relative mass.

All observers are always in motion wrt to light with speed c. Photons are massless.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top