Special Relativity - Finding Velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a spaceship relative to Earth using special relativity concepts, specifically length contraction. The spaceship, measured at 50m in its rest frame, is observed to pass overhead in 1.50 x 10^-6 seconds. The length contraction formula is applied, leading to a calculated contracted length of approximately 49.694m. Using this length and the time, the speed is determined to be about 3.31 x 10^7 m/s. Alternative methods, including time dilation and Lorentz transformations, yield the same result, confirming the calculations.
Insolite
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
A spaceship is measured to be 50m long in it's own rest frame takes ##1.50 \times 10^{-6} s## to pass overhead, as measured by an observer on earth. What is its speed relative to earth?

My attempt at the solution involves the use of the equation for length contraction, ##l = l_{0}\sqrt{1 - \frac{u^{2}}{c^{2}}}##. I have calculated an answer that seems reasonable, but I don't know if the approach that I've taken is correct.

Solution:

##l = l_{0}\sqrt{1 - \frac{u^{2}}{c^{2}}}##, where ##l_{0} = 50m##, ##u = \frac{l}{t}## with respect to earth.
##l = l_{0}\sqrt{1 - \frac{u^{2}}{c^{2}}}##

##l^{2} = l_{0}^{2}(1 - \frac{u^{2}}{c^{2}})##

##\frac{1}{l_{0}^{2}}l^{2} + \frac{u^{2}}{c^{2}} = 1##

##\frac{l^{2}}{l_{0}^{2}} + \frac{l^{2}}{(tc)^{2}} = 1##

##\frac{l^{2}c^{2}t^{2} + l_{0}^{2}l^{2}}{l_{0}^{2}t^{2}c^{2}} = 1##

##l^{2}t^{2}c^{2} + l^{2}l_{0}^{2} = l_{0}^{2}t^{2}c^{2}##

Substituting in the known values of ##l_{0} = 50m## and ##t = 1.50 \times 10^{-6}##:

##l = 49.694m##

Therefore, the spaceship travels this length (which is its length with respect to the earth) in ##1.5 \times 10^{-6} s## with respect to the earth:

Speed = ##\frac{49.694m}{1.5 \times 10^{-6} s}##

## = 3.31 \times 10^{7}ms^{-1}##

If this is in fact correct, are there any other methods that I may have used to arrive at the same answer? (Those using very basic special relativity concepts, including time dilation and Lorentz transformations).

Thanks for any help and advise.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks right but complicated.
As seen from earth, the spaceship has a speed of ##\beta c## and a length contraction factor ##\gamma##, so we get ##t = \frac{l_0}{\beta \gamma}## or
$$t \beta c = l_0 \sqrt{1-\beta^2}$$
$$\frac{\beta}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}} = \frac{l_0}{tc}$$
The right side is a known value (0.111) and you can directly solve the equation for β.

The result is the same.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top