Special relativity question with lots of frames

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving special relativity, where convicts escape in a spaceship and launch a missile at a pursuing patrol ship. Participants clarify that all velocities are relative to the planet, and the need to use relativistic velocity addition to find the missile's speed in the patrol ship's frame. There is confusion about the interpretation of the problem, particularly regarding the timing of events as perceived by different observers. The consensus is to focus on one frame of reference, specifically the planet's, to simplify calculations. Ultimately, understanding the distances and speeds involved is crucial for determining the time it takes for the missile to hit the patrol ship.
Kara386
Messages
204
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


At exactly 00:00:00 hours, a group of convicts escape from a planet in a space-ship that travels at speed
##v=\frac{4}{5}c##.
After 11 min, a patrol spaceship goes after them with ##v_P=\frac{24}{25}c##.
Ignore all acceleration periods.
(i) The convicts immediately notice the patrol spaceship taking off, and release a stealth missile to destroy it. The missile has speed
##v_M=\frac{40}{41}c##
with respect to the convicts. Show that, when the missile hits the patrol ship, the time on a watch worn by the pilot of the patrol ship is 00 : 23 : 36.

Homework Equations


##u_x' = \frac{u_x-v}{1-\frac{u_xv}{c^2}}## (1)
##t' = \gamma (t - \frac{vx}{c^2})## (2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I should say this is from a past paper, so it won't get marked. There are way too many frames! I'm going to assume that all the speeds given are 'proper' speeds.

##u_x=\frac{40}{41}##, I think v is the speed of one frame relative to the other so that might be ##\frac{24}{25}-(-\frac{40}{41}) = \frac{1984}{1025}##. Then I realized that ##u_x'## might not be useful anyway, I was going to just use speed = distance/time, but can't do that because I don't know distances. And (2) probably isn't useful either. Do I try and work out at what time in the ship's frame the missile hits, and transform that? But then do I need to transform the 40/41 to see what the missile's speed is in the ship's frame? Don't I need distances for this approach as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kara386 said:
I'm going to assume that all the speeds given are 'proper' speeds.
There is no such thing. It is very well stated in the problem what the speeds are relative to.

What is not clear from the problem is what this means:
Kara386 said:
The convicts immediately notice the patrol spaceship taking off,
Now, there is only one physically sound interpretation of this, but I am not sure that this is what the problem writer intended.

Also, you do not need to consider more than one frame, you simply need to track what happens in one frame and possibly use concepts of relative simultaneity and so on.
 
Orodruin said:
There is no such thing. It is very well stated in the problem what the speeds are relative to.

What is not clear from the problem is what this means:

Now, there is only one physically sound interpretation of this, but I am not sure that this is what the problem writer intended.

Also, you do not need to consider more than one frame, you simply need to track what happens in one frame and possibly use concepts of relative simultaneity and so on.
Oops, didn't read it properly, clearly. All speeds relative to the planet. OK, I'll try sticking to the frame of the planet. I thought proper times, length etc were in the rest frame of an object?
 
No, all velocities are not given in the planet rest frame, but the velocities in the planet rest frame can be easily figured out using relativistic velocity addition.

Kara386 said:
I thought proper times, length etc were in the rest frame of an object?
Yes, but these are invariant quantities. There is no meaningful way of defining a proper velocity. If you take the velocity of an object in its rest frame it is zero by definition of the rest frame.
 
Orodruin said:
No, all velocities are not given in the planet rest frame, but the velocities in the planet rest frame can be easily figured out using relativistic velocity addition.Yes, but these are invariant quantities. There is no meaningful way of defining a proper velocity. If you take the velocity of an object in its rest frame it is zero by definition of the rest frame.
OK. So are the convict ship and spaceship velocities given in the planet's rest frame then? Just the missile one that isn't? If not I really don't understand the question.
 
My suggestion would be to calculate the speed of the missile relative to the patrol ship -
at what speed does the patrol ship see the approaching missile?
Then you would need the distance between the two ships after 11 minutes -
this would be relativistically contracted when the patrol ship takes off (you know how far the convict's ship
has traveled relative to earth).
Now if you have this information, speed and distance you should be able
to calculate the time for the missile to reach the patrol ship.
 
  • Like
Likes Kara386
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top