Special relativity ~ show that....given this

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating the effects of special relativity on a moving rod, specifically its length contraction and angular rotation as perceived by a stationary observer. The length of the rod, L, is derived as L = L0*√[1-(v2/c2)cos2θ0], indicating that the rod experiences contraction. Additionally, the angle θ that the rod makes with the x-axis is expressed as tanθ = γ*tanθ0, showing that the rod is also rotated. The conversation highlights the necessity of a solid understanding of foundational physics concepts to tackle such problems effectively. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the interplay between length contraction and angular displacement in special relativity.
adamaero
Messages
109
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A rod of length L0 moves with a speed v along the horizontal direction. The rod makes an angle of θ0 with respect to the x'-axis.
(a) Show that the length of the rod as measured by a stationary observer is given by
L = L0*√[1-(v2/c2)cos2θ0]

(b) Show that the angle that the rod makes with the x-axis is given by the expression
tanθ = γ*tanθ0

These results show that the rod is both contracted and rotated. (Take the lower end of the rod to be at the origin of the primed coordinate system.)

Homework Equations


Length Contraction
https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/c6791c2cda6e3f705aabf1345447c0864e250f38

Pythagorean Thm

sin2x + cos2x = 1

Trig ~ tanθ = opp./adj.

The Attempt at a Solution



I realize now that a mix was needed magic bag of math tricks. The picture alone...
But, honestly, I just looked it up:
http://web.unbc.ca/~hussein/Phys_205_Fall_2004/temp/Phys_205_Ch01.pdf#page=4
Static or Physics I, where were you?
Note to self, look at the general structure of the final equation. (Forget about the Einstein equations for a moment.)
In sum, this problem required deeper understanding of past concepts. It is about the knowledge foundation. A roman room may suffice...but that simple identity would have been lost in einstellung anyway? Is it worth it? I didn't learn it deeply in the first place. ADD is inconvenient.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could use the lorentz transformation on the coordinates for the endpoints of the rod.
adamaero said:
It is about the knowledge foundation. A roman room may suffice...but that simple identity would have been lost in einstellung anyway? Is it worth it? I didn't learn it deeply in the first place. ADD is inconvenient.
... these questions do not make sense.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top