Special Relativity, Train Question.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a thought experiment involving special relativity and the timing of events related to a train and a person walking. The key point is the confusion about the reference frame when determining the timing of the person reaching the back of the train as it exits a tunnel. The calculations confirm that the time taken for the person to reach the back of the train in the ground frame is consistent, and the event can be analyzed from any frame without affecting the outcome. The consensus is that using the ground frame simplifies the calculations, and the results will align across different frames. The discussion concludes with validation of the calculations and an encouragement to explore the problem from the train's frame for further understanding.
mmmboh
Messages
401
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img573.imageshack.us/img573/9443/1132y.jpg

So I did what I thought was right, but I'm a little confused on whose frame they are talking about when they say she arrived at the back of the train at the same time the back of the train leaves the tunnel..I think it makes a difference..
but anyway

a) I said the length of the train in the ground frame is L'=L/γ= (1-(0.6c/c)2)1/2*L=4L/5.
Now the time in the ground's frame for the back of the train to pass the tunnel is t=(L+L')/v=(9L/5)/(3c/5)=3L/c, and since the person reaches the back of the train at the same time the train leaves the tunnel, it takes t=3L/c.

b) Now the person travels a distance L in this time, so vw.r.t ground=L/(3L/c)=c/3.

c)ttrain=tground/γ=(4/5)*(3L/c)=12L/5c...either that or t=3L/c...I am a little confused as to in whose frame she arrives at the back of the train at the same time as it leaves the tunnel.

Those are my answers, but I am not sure if I used the frames correctly.

Thanks for any help :).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can anyone help?
 
mmmboh said:
So I did what I thought was right, but I'm a little confused on whose frame they are talking about when they say she arrived at the back of the train at the same time the back of the train leaves the tunnel..I think it makes a difference..
but anyway

I don't think it makes a difference. The event of "train leaving the tunnel" is when the back of the train is at the end of the tunnel, and that is when she arrives at the back of the train. So she is at the same location as the end of the tunnel and the back of the train. This holds for all frames.

a) I said the length of the train in the ground frame is L'=L/γ= (1-(0.6c/c)2)1/2*L=4L/5.

Correct.

Now the time in the ground's frame for the back of the train to pass the tunnel is t=(L+L')/v=(9L/5)/(3c/5)=3L/c, and since the person reaches the back of the train at the same time the train leaves the tunnel, it takes t=3L/c.

Yes, that is the time taken for the walk in the ground frame.

b) Now the person travels a distance L in this time, so vw.r.t ground=L/(3L/c)=c/3.

Yes, that is the velocity of the walker in the ground frame.

c)ttrain=tground/γ=(4/5)*(3L/c)=12L/5c...either that or t=3L/c...I am a little confused as to in whose frame she arrives at the back of the train at the same time as it leaves the tunnel.

Here's the thing. The walker's watch has time dilation given by the walker's velocity; not the train's velocity.

Arriving at the back of the train is an event. You can consider that event in any frame you like. All the frames will give the same result for calculating the time passing on the person's watch; but they will do so with different numbers for her velocity and how for she has moved and how long it took in the frame's time.

You have been using the ground frame. Stick with it; that will give the answer.

For extra credit you could try calculating it in the frame of the train. Should get the same answer for time shown passing on her watch.

Cheers -- sylas
 
Ok, well I would say tperson=tground/γ = (1-(c/3)2/c2)1/2*(3L/c)=(2*21/2)L/c.
Is that right?
 
mmmboh said:
Ok, well I would say tperson=tground/γ = (1-(c/3)2/c2)1/2*(3L/c)=(2*21/2)L/c.
Is that right?

Yes, I think so. It is what I got, anyhow... :-)

Cheers -- sylas
 
thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top