Specific heat capacity of cyclohexanone

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the need for accurate heat capacity data for cyclohexanone to account for heat loss in a specific situation. Participants clarify the difference between specific heat capacity and molar heat capacity, noting that either measurement can be useful. One user expresses frustration at the difficulty of finding reliable data, indicating that the provided resources are insufficient. There is a suggestion to consult specialized chemistry websites for more accurate information. The conversation highlights the challenges in obtaining precise thermal properties for cyclohexanone.
daofeishi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm in a situation where I need to adjust for heat loss, and am at a loss because my "comprehensive" data booklet isn't comprehensive enough. Could anyone please look up the specific molar heat capacity of cyclohexanone for me? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
which one the specific heat capicity or the molar heat capacity?
 
Sorry about that. The isobaric heat capacity or the molar heat capacity. Either is good.
 
Last edited:
oh ok when i read it i was like I am pretty sure that's not a measurement. This is turning out to be hard to find, ill have to check a chemistry website instead of wikipedia
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Calculate the final temperature of the solution
Replies
5
Views
3K
Specific heat capacity of a mixture
Replies
1
Views
5K
Oxidation and specific heat capacity
Replies
2
Views
5K
I Questions about my Understanding of Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Replies
2
Views
3K
Chemistry To determine variables in adiabatic reversible process do we need to look up heat capacity?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Specific heat capacity and latent heat
Replies
2
Views
235
I Estimate thickness of an object based on radiative heat flux decay curve
Replies
2
Views
2K
How much ice to cool down this water?
Replies
17
Views
5K
Specific Heat of Water - What is the Heat Capacity?
Replies
3
Views
7K
Calorimetry - finding the final temperature of a system of ice and water
Replies
7
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top