Spectroscopy and Russell-Saunders coupling

Amok
Messages
254
Reaction score
1
So, this has been bugging me for years (seriously). So my spectroscopy course says the following:

1) In an atom, for a closed subshell, for each electron possesing an m_l quantum number there is another electron possesing -m_l, which means that the sum M_L = \sum {m_l} = 0. I have no problem with this, it is pretty obvious. However, my course concludes from this that the magnitude of the total angular momentum (magnitude of L) has to be 0! How can they know that, I would only conclude that the projection of the vector L on the z-axis is 0 and nothing else!

2)The same rule applies to spin angular momenta.

I guess my more general doubt is how to determine the possible values for the magnitude of L (the sum of angular momenta of electrons) by knowing only the magnitudes of the angular momentum of each individual electron as well as the projection of angular momenta of electron on the z-axis.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If, for example, ##L=1##, then there must exist states with ##M_L= \pm 1## in addition to ##M_L=0##.

If only ##M_L=0## can exist, then the only total angular momentum possible is ##L=0##.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
411
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top