I Spectrum of a function vs of a matrix

Kaguro
Messages
221
Reaction score
57
TL;DR Summary
Why are these two very different things given the same name? Is there any deep relation between spectrum of a matrix and spectrum of a function?
The Fourier transform of a function is called its spectrum. The set of eigenvalues of a matrix is also called a spectrum. Why the same name? Is there some hidden connection between these two?
 
  • Like
Likes S.G. Janssens
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It may be helpful to first think about Fourier series expansion of a square integrable function ##f## on a bounded interval ##(a,b)##, in terms of an eigenbasis ##\{\phi_n\}## of a (possibly unbounded) linear operator ##A## on ##L^2(0,1)##. In this case, the ##n##th Fourier coefficient gives the contribution of ##\phi_n## to this expansion, and the spectrum of ##f## would be the square-summable sequence ##\{(f,\phi_n)\}## of Fourier coefficients. (Here ##(\cdot,\cdot)## denotes the inner product in ##L^2(0,1)##.)

In this case it is natural to speak about "spectrum of ##f##", because of the reference to an eigenbasis of ##A##: If ##A## is a matrix, then its spectrum is - by definition - precisely the set of its eigenvalues. For the case of the Fourier transform on the (unbounded) real line, the eigenbasis is no longer discrete, sums become integrals, and the situation is more delicate than on bounded intervals, but the terminology has remained the same.

It is a good question, by the way.
 
  • Like
Likes Infrared and Kaguro
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top