Spectrum of Pulses: Fast Rise/Fall Times & Discrete Peaks

  • Thread starter Thread starter amfmrad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spectrum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the analysis of pulse sequences using a spectrum analyzer and pulse generator, revealing unexpected spectral characteristics. Fast rise and fall times of 5 nanoseconds and a pulse width of 30 nanoseconds produced a classical (Sinx/x)^2 power spectrum at longer pulse periods. However, at frequencies up to 10 MHz, discrete peaks emerged, prompting the formulation of a specific equation to model the observed spectrum. Concerns were raised about potential Duty Cycle Distortion affecting the results, as the spectrum should not exceed the sinc^2 envelope. The conversation highlights the complexities of pulse sequence analysis and the need for further clarification on the spectral behavior at various frequencies.
amfmrad
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a spectrum analyzer and pulse generator. I decided to see what the spectrum of a sequence of pulses was and found some surprises. The pulses have very fast rise and fall times (5 nanoseconds) with a pulse width of 30 nanoseconds. As a result I obtained the classical (Sinx/x)^2 power spectrum when the pulse period was long (>> 100 nanoseconds). However, as I increased the frequency of the pulse generator to up to 10 MHz (100 nanosecond pulse period) I saw discrete lines peaking at the envelope of the (Sinx/x)^2 spectrum. I then decided to model the spectrum and obtained the following equation which I would like to verify;

P(f)=(VT)^2 * [Sin(x)/x]^2 * [1/(1+y^2)] * [Sin(Nz)/Sin(z)]^2

P(f)=Power Spectrum at frequency f
V=Peak pulse voltage
T=Pulse Width (30 nanoseconds)
Tau=Exponential pulse rise time and fall time (5 nanoseconds)
Tp=Pulse Period (Pulse frequency=1/Tp) (40 nanoseconds minimum)
N= The number of pulses in the sequence (not critical but I use a number like 10 or 100)

x=pie*f*T with pie=3.14196...
y=2*pie*f*Tau
z=pie*f*Tp

I rechecked the equation and believe it to be correct. The calculated spectrum looks like what I see on the spectrum analyzer (discrete lines peaking at the single pulse spectrum) due to the last term in the equation [Sin(Nz)/Sin(z)]^2 which becomes unity at f = m/(2NTp) with m=0,1,2,.. However, this function does crazy things for other frequencies, which I can't explain?.

Incidentally, I have details of my calculations as well as graphs and pictures of the calculated and measured spectra but I don't know how to attach it?

Thanks to those interested.

Norman
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
If your spectrum is rising above the sinc^2 envelope then you must have some other source of energy corrupting your system. I would guess that you have some irregularity in your pulse width (called Duty Cycle Distortion (DCD)).

From the text of your post it sounds like you are sending a clock pattern but if that is the case then you would not see the sinc^2 envelope but discrete peaks. Could you please clarify? If you randomized the data pattern then you would see the sinc^2 envelope.

An excellent summary of the spectral content of signals can be found here:
http://pdfserv.maxim-ic.com/en/an/AN3455.pdf
 
Thanks for information and reference. You are correct that the spectrum never goes above the envelope of the single pulse spectrum (Sinx/x)^2. It all makes better sense now. I was hoping, however, to find a reference to the derivation and unusual property of the function (SinNz/Sinz)^2?

Norman
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top