Speed of a propagating electromagnetic field?

AI Thread Summary
Experiments have shown that the speed of a propagating electromagnetic field, resulting from changes in a magnetic field, is effectively the speed of light. The relationship between changing magnetic and electric fields forms electromagnetic waves, which have been measured with increasing accuracy over centuries. While some suggest using synchronized atomic clocks for measurement, simpler methods using search coils and frequency measurements are also effective. These experiments consistently demonstrate that the speed of electromagnetic waves is independent of their frequency. Understanding this relationship is fundamental to electromagnetic theory and its practical applications.
Exiguus
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm wondering if there has been any actual experiments done to measure the speed at which magnetic fields propagate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you say "propagate" you must be referring to the effect of switching on or changing a magnetic field. You must 'mark it' in some way if you want to find its speed. Once you start to change a magnetic field, an Electric field is formed and then you have an Electromagnetic Wave. The speed of that has been measured with increasing accuracy for several hundred years.
 
Yes, when turning on or altering a magnetic field created by a current. It seems to me when I read that it is more or less assumed it travels with the speed of light, but I cannot find any reference to accurately measuring that using 2 synchronised atomic clocks for example.
 
But it's just a propagating em wave, isn't it? As I said, once you change the H field, an E field results. You can't have one without the other.
You don't need atomic clocks to measure the phase difference in the magnetic field which two search coils would pick up at different distances from a loop with AC passing through it. All you need is a reasonably good measure of the frequency of your AC and look at the phase with a suitable 'scope or timing mechanism. This sort of experiment has been done implicitly or explicitly on many occasions and in many different guises.
It always boils down to measuring the speed of em waves, which always proves to be independent of their frequency. You can either use an electric pickup ( a dipole) or a magnetic pickup (a loop). You get the same answer. I think you can't find references to what you say because it's sort of taken for granted, bearing in mind the theory and past evidence.
 
It is easy to measure the velocity of a TEM (transverse electric magnetic) wave in an air-filled coaxial cable. It is v=\left[ \frac{1}{\epsilon_o \mu_o} \right]^{1/2}
 
Once you have accepted that the magnetic field is part of an EM wave, that is.
 
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
21K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top