Speed of a propagating electromagnetic field?

AI Thread Summary
Experiments have shown that the speed of a propagating electromagnetic field, resulting from changes in a magnetic field, is effectively the speed of light. The relationship between changing magnetic and electric fields forms electromagnetic waves, which have been measured with increasing accuracy over centuries. While some suggest using synchronized atomic clocks for measurement, simpler methods using search coils and frequency measurements are also effective. These experiments consistently demonstrate that the speed of electromagnetic waves is independent of their frequency. Understanding this relationship is fundamental to electromagnetic theory and its practical applications.
Exiguus
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm wondering if there has been any actual experiments done to measure the speed at which magnetic fields propagate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you say "propagate" you must be referring to the effect of switching on or changing a magnetic field. You must 'mark it' in some way if you want to find its speed. Once you start to change a magnetic field, an Electric field is formed and then you have an Electromagnetic Wave. The speed of that has been measured with increasing accuracy for several hundred years.
 
Yes, when turning on or altering a magnetic field created by a current. It seems to me when I read that it is more or less assumed it travels with the speed of light, but I cannot find any reference to accurately measuring that using 2 synchronised atomic clocks for example.
 
But it's just a propagating em wave, isn't it? As I said, once you change the H field, an E field results. You can't have one without the other.
You don't need atomic clocks to measure the phase difference in the magnetic field which two search coils would pick up at different distances from a loop with AC passing through it. All you need is a reasonably good measure of the frequency of your AC and look at the phase with a suitable 'scope or timing mechanism. This sort of experiment has been done implicitly or explicitly on many occasions and in many different guises.
It always boils down to measuring the speed of em waves, which always proves to be independent of their frequency. You can either use an electric pickup ( a dipole) or a magnetic pickup (a loop). You get the same answer. I think you can't find references to what you say because it's sort of taken for granted, bearing in mind the theory and past evidence.
 
It is easy to measure the velocity of a TEM (transverse electric magnetic) wave in an air-filled coaxial cable. It is v=\left[ \frac{1}{\epsilon_o \mu_o} \right]^{1/2}
 
Once you have accepted that the magnetic field is part of an EM wave, that is.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
21K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top