Speed of body traveling in elliptical path

  • Thread starter Thread starter Varnson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Path Speed
Varnson
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A body follows an elliptical path defined by r = sd/(1-s*cosP), where s and d are constant. If the angular speed is constant (dP/dT = w), show that the body's speed is v = rw[1+{(r*sinP)/d}^2]^(1/2)


Homework Equations


v = dr/dT*rhat + r*dP/dT*Phat; P = theta, I am not sure how to insert a theta symbol


The Attempt at a Solution


Right now I am thinking that I should find dr/dt. But as I see it since, there is no time dependence in the original equation, dr/dt = 0. Am I safe to take the derivative of r and use it as v? I am thinking no, since v is the magnitude of the velocity vector. Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Varnson said:

Homework Statement


A body follows an elliptical path defined by r = sd/(1-s*cosP), where s and d are constant. If the angular speed is constant (dP/dT = w), show that the body's speed is v = rw[1+{(r*sinP)/d}^2]^(1/2)

Homework Equations


v = dr/dT*rhat + r*dP/dT*Phat; P = theta, I am not sure how to insert a theta symbol

The Attempt at a Solution


Right now I am thinking that I should find dr/dt. But as I see it since, there is no time dependence in the original equation, dr/dt = 0. Am I safe to take the derivative of r and use it as v? I am thinking no, since v is the magnitude of the velocity vector. Thanks for the help!
You've got the parts of it right, but you're a little confused.

\vec{v} = \frac{d}{dt} (r \hat{r} ) = r \omega \hat{\theta} + \hat{r} \frac{dr}{dt}

From this, you can write down the magnitude of the velocity, | \vec{v} |

The only missing piece, is to evaluate dr/dt. This you can do from the elliptic equation, with the time dependence embedded in \theta(t).
 
Use the chain rule. d/dT=d/dP*dP/dT. P is a function of time and so is r through it's dependence on P.
 
I figured it out, I was stuck after I took the derivative, then i solved for r/d and the answer was right there in front of me! Thanks for the help!
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top