Speed of car related to momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a 1000 kg car with four passengers, each weighing 75 kg, as they jump off at 2 m/s relative to the car. For simultaneous jumps, the car's speed is calculated to be 0.6 m/s, while for sequential jumps, the final speed after all four passengers jump off is determined to be approximately 0.73 m/s. Participants emphasize the importance of using the ground as a reference frame for accurate momentum calculations. There is a consensus that the relative speed of the jumpers affects the car's final velocity, and the calculations are adjusted accordingly. The final results highlight the significance of understanding momentum conservation in such scenarios.
songoku
Messages
2,475
Reaction score
389

Homework Statement


A 1000 kg car with 4 people on it, each 75 kg, is at rest. The people jump off the car with speed 2 ms-1 relative to the car. Find the speed of the car if the people jump off :

a. simultaneously
b. one by one

Homework Equations


conservation of momentum

The Attempt at a Solution



a.
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1V1 + m2V2

0 = 300 * 2 - 1000 * v2

v2 = 0.6 ms-1b.
(i) when person 1 jumps off :
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1V1 + m2V2

0 = 75 * 2 - 1225 * v2

v2 = 6/49 ms-1

(ii) when person 2 jumps off :
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1V1 + m2V2

0 = 75 * (2 + 6/49) - 1150 * v2

v2 = 156/1127 ms-1

(iii) when person 3 jumps off :
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1V1 + m2V2

0 = 75 * (2 + 156/1127) - 1075 * v2

v2 = 7230/48461 ms-1

(iv) when person 4 jumps off :
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1V1 + m2V2

0 = 75 * (2 + 7230/48461) - 1000*v2

v2 = 0.161 ms-1

I calculated this with respect to the car. Do I get it right? For this kind of question, what should be taken as the reference, the car or the ground?

ThanksEDIT : I just realized my mistake. The reference should be ground and when person 2, 3 and 4 jump off one by one, there should be initial momentum relative to the ground. I'll amend my calculation in the next post
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
a. the answer is still the same

b. assume the car moves to the left and the person jumps off to the right
(i) when person 1 jumps off :
0 = 75 * 2 - 1225 * v2

v2 = 6/49 ms-1

(ii) when person 2 jumps off :
-(75 * 6/49) - 1225 * 6/49 = 75 * (2 + 6/49) - 1150 * v2

v2 = 312/1127 ms-1

(iii)when person 3 jumps off :
- 75*312/1127 - 1150 * 312/1127 = 75*(2 + 312/1127) - 1075 * v2

v2 = 0.474 ms-1

(iv)when person 4 jumps off :
- 75 * 0.474 - 1075 * 0.474 = 75 * (2 + 0.474) - 1000 * v2

v2 = 0.73 ms-1

So the final speed of the car = 0.73 ms-1

Do I get it right? Thanks
 
Last edited:
Sorry fo bumping...

Can someone please check my work? Thanks :smile:
 
songoku said:
b. assume the car moves to the left and the person jumps off to the right
(i) when person 1 jumps off :
0 = 75 * 2 - 1225 * v2

v2 = 6/49 ms-1

I agree with this part. Here's my picture (jumping off to the left):
http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/9197/mv1.jpg




(ii) when person 2 jumps off :
-(75 * 6/49) - 1225 * 6/49 = 75 * (2 + 6/49) - 1150 * v2

v2 = 312/1127 ms-1

(iii)when person 3 jumps off :
- 75*312/1127 - 1150 * 312/1127 = 75*(2 + 312/1127) - 1075 * v2

v2 = 0.474 ms-1

(iv)when person 4 jumps off :
- 75 * 0.474 - 1075 * 0.474 = 75 * (2 + 0.474) - 1000 * v2

v2 = 0.73 ms-1

So the final speed of the car = 0.73 ms-1

Do I get it right? Thanks

I don't agree with these. My picture, for part (ii) is,
http://img246.imageshack.us/img246/6475/mv2q.jpg

when I use a frame at rest, although, it would be easier to make a new inertial frame for each jump, that moves at the constant speed of the previous jump. Basically, you can use a frame at rest to get \rm V_1, then a frame moving at \rm V_1 to get \rm V_2,...etc.

The jumpers each give \rm \frac{mv}{3m+M}, \rm \frac{mv}{2m+M}, \rm \frac{mv}{m+M}, and \rm \frac{mv}{M} respectiviely, which can be summed to find the final speed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi dr_k

So for the case when person 2 jumps off, the equation should be (based on your picture):

(3*75 + 1000) * 6/49 = - (2 - 6/49) * 75 + 1150 * V2 ??


And I don't understand about this part "it would be easier to make a new inertial frame for each jump, that moves at the constant speed of the previous jump. Basically, you can use a frame at rest to get V1 , then a frame moving at V1 to get V2, ... etc"

Can you please explain more? Thanks
 
songoku said:
Hi dr_k

So for the case when person 2 jumps off, the equation should be (based on your picture):

(3*75 + 1000) * 6/49 = - (2 - 6/49) * 75 + 1150 * V2 ??

Yep. Drawing the picture is 1/2 the problem.

And I don't understand about this part "it would be easier to make a new inertial frame for each jump, that moves at the constant speed of the previous jump. Basically, you can use a frame at rest to get V1 , then a frame moving at V1 to get V2, ... etc"

Can you please explain more? Thanks

Well, solving for \rm V_2, in the second picture, gives \rm V_2 = V_1 + \frac{m v}{2 m + M}, where \rm V_1 = \frac{m v}{3 m + M}. Basically the objects in the the (i) initial and (f) final picture are all traveling at \rm V_1. Instead of carrying these terms, you could just make an inertial frame moving at constant speed \rm V_1, and then remember to sum up the speed of the frames at the end. For example, the second picture above now looks like

http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/4534/frames1.jpg

This frame says \rm V' = \frac{m v}{2 m + M}. To get the speed for an observer at rest, just add \rm V_1 + V' . Now do this as many times as required to get all four masses off.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi dr_k

Maybe I get your point. I'll try it first. Thanks a lot ! :smile:
 
songoku said:

Homework Statement


A 1000 kg car with 4 people on it, each 75 kg, is at rest. The people jump off the car with speed 2 ms-1 relative to the car. Find the speed of the car if the people jump off :

a. simultaneously
b. one by one


Homework Equations


conservation of momentum


The Attempt at a Solution



a.
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1V1 + m2V2

0 = 300 * 2 - 1000 * v2

v2 = 0.6 ms-1


b.
(i) when person 1 jumps off :
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1V1 + m2V2

0 = 75 * 2 - 1225 * v2

v2 = 6/49 ms-1

(ii) when person 2 jumps off :
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1V1 + m2V2

0 = 75 * (2 + 6/49) - 1150 * v2

v2 = 156/1127 ms-1

(iii) when person 3 jumps off :
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1V1 + m2V2

0 = 75 * (2 + 156/1127) - 1075 * v2

v2 = 7230/48461 ms-1

(iv) when person 4 jumps off :
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1V1 + m2V2

0 = 75 * (2 + 7230/48461) - 1000*v2

v2 = 0.161 ms-1

I calculated this with respect to the car. Do I get it right? For this kind of question, what should be taken as the reference, the car or the ground?

Thanks


EDIT : I just realized my mistake. The reference should be ground and when person 2, 3 and 4 jump off one by one, there should be initial momentum relative to the ground. I'll amend my calculation in the next post

Good Morning Songoku,

I was just looking at this problem, and I noticed that I didn't read the problem carefully enough. There is a subtle point that I neglected. The problem states "The people jump off the car with speed 2 ms-1 relative to the car". Relative to the car implies that I missed something. In part "(a) a. simultaneously", the picture should look like this:

http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/4534/frames1.jpg

This picture correctly shows both 4m and M moving with \rm V_1, and therefore v is "relative" to the car.

This implies

\rm 0 = M V_1 - 4m (v-V_1)

so

\rm V_1 = \frac{4mv}{M+4m} .

Putting the numbers in gives \rm V_1 = .4615 m/s for part (a).

Give me a few minutes, and I'll write something up for part (b).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For part (b):

http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/7726/frames2.jpg

Here v is "relative" to the car, and we get

\rm V_1 = \frac{mv}{4m+M}

Now I make a new inertial frame, moving in a straight line at constant speed \rm V_1 ,

http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/8674/frames3.jpg

where

\rm V_2 = \frac{mv}{3m+M}

Do this two more times, with new inertial frames, to get the last two masses off. The final speed of the car is therefore

\rm V_{car} = V_1+V_2+V_3+V_4 = \frac{mv}{4m+M}+\frac{mv}{3m+M}+\frac{mv}{2m+M}+\frac{mv}{m+M} = .5078 m/s
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Hi dr k

Ah I see my mistake for neglecting "relative" . Thanks ! :smile:
 
  • #11
songoku said:
Hi dr k

Ah I see my mistake for neglecting "relative" . Thanks ! :smile:

I missed it as well! But I think we've got it covered now.
 
Back
Top