Speed of Gravity = c: Does Traveling at C Affect Gravity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether an object traveling at the speed of light (c) would experience gravity. It is established that no object with mass can reach c, making the question largely theoretical. Light, which travels at c, is influenced by gravity through the curvature of space-time. However, if a massive object appears suddenly in a region where light has already passed, the light would not be affected by the new gravity. The conversation highlights the need for more accurate measurements of gravity's speed and its relationship with light.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
it has been reported that the speed of gravity = c does this mean that an object traveling at c would not feel the efects of gravity?
ttayeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org


Originally posted by wolram
it has been reported that the speed of gravity = c does this mean that an object traveling at c would not feel the efects of gravity?
ttayeg
Well... since an object can't travel at C, its kinda a pointless question. LIGHT however, travels at C and is affected by gravity (or rather the curvature of space that gravity creates).
 
Right, the path of a photon is affected when it travels through an area of space-time that has already been curved by gravity.

However, if a photon were to pass through a relatively "flat" area of space-time and, after it had passed, a massive object (such as a planet) suddenly materialized in that space, the gravity from that planet would (theoretically) never effect that photon. The sudden appearance of the planet would send a huge gravity wave out in all directions, this wave would propagate at lightspeed, and never "catch up" to anything traveling at lightspeed the had already passed.
 


Greetings !
Originally posted by wolram
it has been reported that the speed of gravity = c ...
I believe the current proven possible range
was reported to be something like 0.8 - 1.05 c.
(This could be outdated or slightly inaccurate info.)
More accurate tests are still required to
make sure that reality "follows" the laws of theory.

As for the question - since no particle with rest
mass can reach c, it is somewhat pointless to ask
"What if... ?" about this.

Live long and prosper.
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by drag
Greetings !

I believe the current proven possible range
was reported to be something like 0.8 - 1.05 c.
(This could be outdated or slightly inaccurate info.)
More accurate tests are still required to
make sure that reality "follows" the laws of theory.

As for the question - since no particle with rest
mass can reach c, it is somewhat pointless to ask
"What if... ?" about this.

Live long and prosper.

Wouldn't it make sense that gravity would also travel at the speed of light, as it seems more then unlikely it would travel at 1.05c, and as you stated, it has zero rest mass. Those figures seem to ring a bell of a recent experiment done by Sergei Kopeikin in which they, supposedly, measured the speed of gravity by measuring how much "wobble" was in Quasar JO842+1835 as it passed by Jupiter. Upon review by peers, it was reported they simply found a new way to measure light, not actually the speed at which gravity affects space.

Some would have also said it was pointless to ask "What if...there was no ether.":wink:

If nobody asks, then nobody learns!
 
Last edited:

Thread 'Potential biosignature found in Mars rock'

Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
View full post »

Thread 'Does it make sense to build new radio telescopes?'

TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
View full post »
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'

Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'

This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
View full post »

Similar threads

I How Does Gravity Affect Spectral Line Strength?
Replies
2
Views
1K
I How does gravitational self-interaction affect the Milky Way Galaxy?
Replies
3
Views
2K
B Would planets fall out of orbit when gravity has a speed?
Replies
7
Views
1K
I Why Does Gravity Remain when Star Mass Dissipates?
Replies
10
Views
2K
Stargazing Receding Galaxies and the Range of Gravity
Replies
15
Views
2K
What Happens to Gravity When an Object Travels at the Speed of Light?
Replies
21
Views
3K
I General relativity question: Gravity clock
Replies
3
Views
982
I Magnetism and Gravity Discussion/Questions
Replies
15
Views
2K
I Black Hole Event Horizon Hypothesis
Replies
6
Views
2K
I On gravity and the conservation of energy
Replies
30
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top