Speed of light is set to be 299,792,458 m/s

AI Thread Summary
The speed of light is universally measured at 299,792,458 m/s, regardless of the observer's frame of reference. As one approaches this speed, time dilation occurs for external observers, but the individual experiences time normally. This means that all observers, regardless of their relative speeds, will measure the speed of light as constant. The concept of time being relative is central to understanding these measurements, as each observer perceives time differently based on their motion. Thus, the laws of physics remain consistent across all inertial frames, reinforcing the constancy of light's speed.
MaoIragorri
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have a question...
The speed of light is set to be 299,792,458 m/s
but if time slows as you approach the speed of light,
how can we tell how fast Light itself is actually traveling?
 
Science news on Phys.org


MaoIragorri said:
I have a question...
The speed of light is set to be 299,792,458 m/s
but if time slows as you approach the speed of light,
how can we tell how fast Light itself is actually traveling?

As you approach c relative to some external reference frame, you do not experience a time dilation, you experience time passing normally. But the observers in that external reference frame experience your time as increasingly attenuated.


All observers - on the spaceship and off it regardless of their speed with respect to each other - will measure the speed of light as 299,792,458 m/s.

There are many searchable posts on this forum that go into it in more detail.
 


Length also contracts when approaching the speed of light. Relativistically speaking, the speed of light is constant in all reference frames; measurement of it shouldn't change from one frame to another.
 


yeah, but the are all external references...
if time starts to slow down around you, then a second becomes elongated...
to people around you the second might remain a second, but if to you the second becomes, let's say an hour... how fast are you moving per second.

does this make sense?
 


MaoIragorri said:
does this make sense?
No.

The first postulate of Special Relativity is that the laws of the universe are the same for any inertial (non accelerating) observer. What this means here is that there is no experiment you can perform to distinguish an absolute motion. You may be stationary with respect to one outside observer, moving at 1,000 mph with respect to another and moving at 10,000 mph with respect to another. And all 3 of these observers (and you) can consider themself stationary and measure the speed of light to be C in their frame.

Don't say "if time starts to slow down around you" - that's nonsensical. You never see any change in your clock, but your clock runs at one rate for you, another rate with respect to the clock of that guy moving at 1,000 mph and yet another rate wrt the guy moving at 10,000 mph. Time isn't variable, it is relative.
 


Briliant, thanks all.
 
Thread 'Simple math model for a Particle Image Velocimetry system'
Hello togehter, I am new to this forum and hope this post followed all the guidelines here (I tried to summarized my issue as clean as possible, two pictures are attached). I would appreciate every help: I am doing research on a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) system. For this I want to set a simple math model for the system. I hope you can help me out. Regarding this I have 2 main Questions. 1. I am trying to find a math model which is describing what is happening in a simple Particle...
Thread 'How to model converging illumination through object plane (in ZEMAX)'
Hello community, I'm designing a projection lens system for a 35mm film projector in Zemax OpticStudio and struggling with the correct sequential mode setup for the illumination geometry. The light source is a Xenon short-arc lamp reflected by an ellipsoid mirror, which creates a converging cone with a 40.6 degree full angle that passes through the film gate. The film gate is my object plane, but the light doesn't diverge from it like a typical Lambertian source. Instead, the converging...

Similar threads

Back
Top