Speed of sound minimum distance problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating minimum distances based on the speed of sound in air and water. The initial problem involves determining the distance from a carpenter to the observer, with the correct calculation accounting for the time taken for the hammer to rise after each strike, resulting in a minimum distance of approximately 86 meters. The second problem concerns oil exploration, where explorers detect an echo from an explosion, leading to a calculation of the depth they need to drill. The participant initially calculates a distance of 695.6 meters but questions the speed of sound in granite, suggesting it is faster than in water, which could affect the final depth needed to reach the oil. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding sound propagation in different mediums for accurate measurements.
bigsaucy
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hi all, just a question I am having trouble with

1.) You're watching a carpenter pound a nail. He hits the nail twice a second, but you hear the sound of the strike when his hammer is fully raised. What is the minimum distance from you to the carpenter? assume the air temperature is 20 degrees celcius.

I figured that since the speed of sound in air at 20 degrees celcius is 343 m/s and it takes him 0.50 seconds to hit the nail once, that the minimum distance is (0.5) (343) which is 171.5 m but the book says the answer is 86m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're not accounting for the fact that although the nail is struck twice in one second, it takes a certain amount of time for the man to raise his hammer for the next strike on the nail head. Look at it this way: time = 0, hammer hits nail; time = 0.25 s, hammer at max. height above nail and you hear sound from previous strike; time = 0.50 s, hammer hits nail, time = 0.75 s, hammer at max. height and sound is heard; time = 1.0 s, hammer hits nail. Therefore, you are 0.25 * 343 = 85.75 m from the nail.
 
ok thanks for that, i understand it now. since you're here I might as well get help with another quesiton:

Oil explorers set off explosives to make louds sounds, then listens for the echoes from underground oil deposits. Geologists suspect that there is oil under 500-m deep lake physics. It's known that lake physics is carved out of a granite basin. Explorers detect a weak echo 0.94s after exploding dynamite at the lake surface. If it's really oil, how deep will they have to drill into the granite to reach it?

i reasoned that since the speed of sound in water is 1480 m/s and it takes 0.94/s or 0.47 seconds to reach the oil bed, that the sound wave from the explosion travels 695.6m which is 195.6m from the granite basin. the book says the answer is 760m
 
Do they tell you the speed of sound in granite? It should be much faster than in water, right?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top