Speed vehicle travelling on impact

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on estimating the speed of a vehicle involved in a rear-end collision. The user describes being stationary at a junction when struck by another vehicle, which did not apply brakes and continued traveling further than their own vehicle. Responses emphasize that accident reconstruction requires professional expertise and cannot be accurately determined through informal online discussions. The complexities of such incidents make simple calculations inadequate for reliable analysis. The thread concludes with a reminder to seek professional assistance for accurate assessments.
beckybezo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys
hoping someone is able to answer this albeit a estimated reply.
I am trying to figure out the speed I was hit at in a recent accident.

I was stationary at a junction (vehicle weight aproz 1470kg) foot on brake
was hit from behind (vehicle weight aprox 2000kg)
was hit full on driver did not apply brakes (no skid marks) Driver claims not to have seen me

From the point of impact my vehicle traveled aprox 24 metres my foot was still on the brake during this time.

From the point of impact the vehicle hitting me continued to travel 36 metres

It was a clear dry afternoon.

Any help would be appreciated as to an estimated speed that I was hit at.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:

We get similar questions often on PF. But accident reconstruction is something for trained professionals, not amateurs, or even physicists.

A simple question and answer on an Internet forum is not very useful.
 
I figured there must be a mathematical equation to work this out..I guess it's not that simple then ? Thankyou for taking the time to reply Anorlunda.
 
If you were hit from behind, how is it that the vehicle that hit you traveled twelve meters more than you?
 
I'm sorry but we don't allow traffic accident analysis here at PF. Accidents are too complex to give an accurate analysis, especially without physically investigating the scene. If you need help, please consult a professional trained in this area.

Thread locked.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top