Speeding into a supersize black hole

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anders Lundberg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
Anders Lundberg
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
The galaxy NGC4261 is believed to contain a black hole that weighs about one hundred thousand times as much as our sun, with a diameter the size of our solar system. (http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/gr/public/bh_obsv.html)

Now, imagine that we clear the space around the black hole and use some kind of spaceship to first build up a near light speed velocity. Then, from a distance of a few "light days" (we suppose that this black hole has a diameter of almost a "light day") we aim straight at the black hole, turn off the engines and just plainly falls towards it.

My question is; If the spaceship already is at very near light speed, why doesn't the massive gravitational field from the black hole manage to accelerate the spaceship to above light speed before it reaches the black hole? Any relativistic mass increase of the spaceship would not make any difference since it is accelerated by a gravitational field (and not by its engines), so what is stopping it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What happens when things fall in a gravitational field? They gain kinetic energy.

There is no limit on kinetic energy. You can fall towards a black hole and gain nearly infinite amounts of kinetic energy.

But nearly infinite amounts of kinetic energy are not enough to travel faster then the speed of light. Better luck next time.
 
Some thought needs to be given as to how the velocity is being measured. For instance, the coordiante velocity dr/dt for an object falling into a black hole will be zero! The most convenient number is not a velocity, but a rapidity - dr/dtau, which is the rate of change of the Schwarzschild coordinate 'r' with the proper time 'tau'.

For more on rapidities in SR see for instance

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/velocity.html
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Back
Top