Sphere on a Flat Plane: 3 Points of Contact?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CheesyPeeps
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flat Plane Sphere
AI Thread Summary
A perfect sphere theoretically has only one point of contact with a flat plane, but in reality, three points of contact are needed for stability. This stability is influenced by the materials of both the sphere and the surface, as both will deform under pressure. The discussion highlights that at a microscopic level, spheres like billiard balls appear lumpy and are not as solid as they seem, resulting in many close atomic interactions rather than distinct contact points. The question of whether the three-atom rule applies to spheres of any size remains open, as it may vary with the sphere's circumference. Overall, the interaction between spheres and surfaces is complex and depends on their physical properties.
CheesyPeeps
Messages
36
Reaction score
2
I've been reading about how much of a sphere actually touches a flat plane (spheres are very interesting things, it turns out!). Mathematically, a perfect sphere has only one point of contact, meaning that the area of this contact is infinitely small(?), but as physicists, we know that there must be three points of contact for the sphere to be at rest. Therefore, we can say that three atoms need to touch the flat plane for the sphere to be at rest.

My question is whether this three-atom rule is the same for any size of sphere, or does it change as sphere circumference increases/decreases?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good question, Mycroft...Hmmmm

(Long story short me and Cheesy Peeps are best friends and this is kinda an in-joke)
 
If you zoom into a billiard ball it won't look very smooth at all. It will look very lumpy. Also you will find that it is not as solid as it appears. So when it is resting on a surface (which will be equally lumpy) zoomed up close it would look more like a sponge resting on another sponge. There will not actually be any points of contact since the repulsive force between electrons in the atoms will keep everything separated. But there will be many close atoms.

On the other hand, if you are talking mathematically, then you can imagine an enormous perfect spherical polyhedron made of triangles. And then mathemat ically it could be at rest if a triangular face lay on the surface of a flat plan. It could also theoretically balance on one or two points but that would be an unstable position.
 
Curious, we had the identical question yesterday.

It depends on the materials of the sphere and the flat surface of course. They will both deform.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top