Spin 1/2 System: Eigenstates of Sz and Probability of Measurement

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



For a spin 1/2 system, the eigenstates of z-component of the angular-momentum operator Sz are given by:

S_z |\pm> = \pm \frac{\hbar}{2}|\pm>

Suppose at time t, the state of the system is given by:

|\psi> = a|+> + b|->

If Sz is measured, what are the possible results of measurement and their probabilities?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Possibilities: State |+> or |->.

<+|S_z|\psi> = \frac{\hbar}{2} <+|\psi> = \frac{\hbar}{2}a

Probability of |+> state = ##\frac{\hbar ^2 a^2}{4}##

Similarly,

Probability for |-> state = ##\frac{\hbar ^2 b^2}{4}##

This is weird, as the probability should just be ##a^2## and ##b^2## correspondingly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But what's wrong with this? It is literally the "expected value of Sz".
 
Is an expected value the same thing as a probability?

How is the probability of a measurement calculated?

How is the expected value of an observable calculated?
 
George Jones said:
Is an expected value the same thing as a probability?

How is the probability of a measurement calculated?

How is the expected value of an observable calculated?

I hope I got this right.

Explanation
The eigenvalue of the operator Sz is the observable, ##\pm\frac{\hbar}{2}##.

The observable corresponding to operator Sz is angular momentum, ##\pm\frac{\hbar}{2}##.

The observables of Sz can take upon real values q1, q2, ... which are ##\pm\frac{\hbar}{2}##.

For each possible value, the system can be in a state |q1>, |q2>, ... which are for ##+\frac{\hbar}{2}## is ##|+>## and for ##-\frac{\hbar}{2}## is ##|->##

Possible states of system are |+>, |->Expected value ≠ Probability

Expected value of observable A = sandwich of operator that gives observable A = ##<\psi|\hat{A}|\psi>## ≠ Probability of measurement

Probability of a measurement = possibility of finding observable in a state ##\|q_i>## which is ## |\pm>## which means ##<q_i|\psi>^2 = <\pm|\psi>^2##.

This comes out as unitless, which looks right.
 
Last edited:
unscientific said:
An observable Q, such as Sz can take upon real values q1, q2, ...

Yes. (upon measurement of course)

For each possible value, the system can be in a state |q1>, |q2>, ...

Upon measurement returning a certain eigenvalue, the wave function collapses into the
corresponding eigenstate, yes, but before measurement it could have been in any linear
combination including this eigenstate. That's where probabilities come into play.

Possible states of system are |q1>, |q2>, ... and in this case it would be ##\frac{\hbar}{2}|\pm>##

The eigenstates are |±>, with Sz|±> = ±##\frac{\hbar}{2}|\pm>##

Expected value ≠ Probability

Yes.

Probability of a measurement = possibility of finding observable in a state |qi> which means ##<q_i|\psi>^2 = (\frac{\hbar}{2})^2<\pm|\psi>^2##

Probability of a measurement =<qi|ψ>2=##<\pm|\psi>^2##≠ ##(\frac{\hbar}{2})^2<\pm|\psi>^2##
Also, the rest is bad wording: the probability of a measurement is self explanatory, it's the
probability that a measurement returns a certain value. You don't observe a state.

Expected value of observable A = ##<\psi|A|\psi>## ≠ Probability of measurement

Yep.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top