Spin Polarization and Momentum in Particle Decay

FortranMan
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
In an elementary particle decay, such as the decay of a positive pion into a positive muon and a muon neutrino, are the spin polarizations of either product always parallel (or anti-parallel) to their momentum? If so why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The muon neutrino is so close to massless that its spin must be aligned with its momentum (helicity=+1/2). Since the pi is spinless, the muon must also have +1/2 helicity. For other decays, the polarization may not be 100%.
The momentum direction makes a good z axis to describe polarization because then L_z=0.
 
pam said:
The muon neutrino is so close to massless that its spin must be aligned with its momentum (helicity=+1/2). Since the pi is spinless, the muon must also have +1/2 helicity. For other decays, the polarization may not be 100%.
The momentum direction makes a good z axis to describe polarization because then L_z=0.

Hi,

I think neutrinos are Left-handed so helicity = -1/2 ?
 
You are right about neutrinos, but a positive muon is an anti-lepton, so the "neutrino" in this case is really a right-handed anti-neutrino.
 
pam said:
You are right about neutrinos, but a positive muon is an anti-lepton, so the "neutrino" in this case is really a right-handed anti-neutrino.

I thought that if the muon emitted is an antilepton, the muon neutrino had to be a neutrino, not an antineutrino. no?
 
I am greatly embarrassed by making the same silly mistake twice, and apologize to all.
I must have been sleepthinking. Thank you Barmecides and kdv for your corrections.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top