Spin Quantum Number: Why is it Always + or - 1/2?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Spin Quantum Number of electrons, which is always +1/2 or -1/2 due to their classification as fermions, possessing intrinsic spin characteristics. The value of 1/2 is fundamental to electron behavior and is linked to the outcomes observed in experiments like the Stern-Gerlach experiment, where electrons exhibit two distinct spin states. While resources like Hyperphysics provide insights into electron behavior, they do not explain why the spin is specifically ±1/2. The concept of spin angular momentum is analogous to orbital angular momentum, with the spin value emerging from theoretical derivations that are complex and not typically covered in basic courses. The discussion emphasizes that the intrinsic nature of electrons dictates this spin value, reinforcing the idea that it is a fundamental characteristic of these particles.
dhruvarora22
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
My chemistry teacher gave us a question just to make us search that why is the Spin Quantum Number always + or - 1/2. I tried searching on the net, but i got different answers on different websites. Why exactly is it, why can't it be 1,2,3 or some other number.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I am afraid as of now the only answer to the question "why" is "because that's the way it is". This is intrinsic characteristic of electron - period.

Hyperphysics site discusses different aspects of the electron behavior - but these are effects of the electron having a spin of ±1/2, not the reason for the spin to be ±1/2.


--

 
Last edited:
A great quote I once heard went something like, "It is easy to describe what light does, but it is hard to describe what light is." I suppose that can be applied to various fundamental concepts.

When I think back to my undergraduate quantum mechanics course, my professor introduced orbital angular momentum, and described a lot of implications and observations based on its nature. Spin angular momentum was introduced since it behaved analogous to orbital angular momentum. The initial picture of an electron was a spherical object, spinning on its own axis like a top. As another picture, imagine the Earth rotating around the sun as depicting orbital angular momentum, and the Earth rotating about its own axis (night/day) as depicting spin angular momentum. Very crude, but it kinda illustrates the initial picture.

This intrinsic angular momentum associated with its spin about its own axis helped explain a lot of observations (like why electrons would deflect into two beams in a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern%E2%80%93Gerlach_experiment" ). The value of 1/2 came out from the fact that only two possible outcomes were possible.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is a long derivation to prove this requiring a theorem which i think is not even included in M.Sc. So don't stress urself out too much.
Btw, I haven't studied much about spin q. no. till now(just one class!) but my teacher said that there is a single orbital and according and the electrons rotate opposite to each other.
So, the value is +1/2 and -1/2.
I'm not so sure abt this anyways
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top