Spin Time Development: Solving for Initial State in B-Field | Homework Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lawrencel2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spin Time
Lawrencel2
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a B field initially in the x-direction, and its constant:
\widehat{H}= - (\dfrac{e}{mc})\overrightarrow{B} \dot{} \overrightarrow{S}

At t=0 it was prepared so that Sz has an eigenvalue of + hbar/2
I want to show the time evolution of the initial state.

Homework Equations


\widehat{H}= - (\dfrac{e}{mc})\overrightarrow{B} \dot{} \overrightarrow{S}
\widehat{U} = e^{\dfrac{-i H}{\hbar}t} Time evolution

The Attempt at a Solution


It would evolve as so:
|\alpha, t> = c_{1} e^{\dfrac{-i H}{\hbar}t} |+> +c_{2} e^{\dfrac{-i H}{\hbar}t} |->

But we know at t = 0 it should give us a spin up of hbar/2..
So evaluate at t=0:

|\alpha, 0> = c_{1} e^{\dfrac{-i H}{\hbar}0} |+> +c_{2} e^{\dfrac{-i H}{\hbar}0} |->
|\alpha, 0> = c_{1} |+>+c_{2} |-> = 1|+>
Then that means that C1 = 1 and C2 = 0..?

But intuitively I know that it precesses in the ZY plane since B is in the X-direction.. If I just got rid of the C2 coefficient, then i will never be able to show how it precesses into the spin down? Ahh i feel like I'm missing something here.. Any tips on what I am doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lawrencel2 said:
It would evolve as so:
|\alpha, t> = c_{1} e^{\dfrac{-i H}{\hbar}t} |+> +c_{2} e^{\dfrac{-i H}{\hbar}t} |->
If ##| + \rangle## and ##| - \rangle## are eigenstates of ##S_z##, then they are not eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. This equation is therefore not correct.
 
DrClaude said:
If ##| + \rangle## and ##| - \rangle## are eigenstates of ##S_z##, then they are not eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. This equation is therefore not correct.
Then how can I express the state? I need to find the development of the state up to some arbitrary time T when the b field switches into the z direction...
 
You have to write it in terms of the eigenstates of ##S_x##.
 
DrClaude said:
You have to write it in terms of the eigenstates of ##S_x##.
AH. well I'm confused now.
\vert\alpha, t \rangle = \dfrac{a}{\sqrt{2}} e^{i t\dfrac{H}{\hbar}} \vert +\rangle\pm\dfrac{b}{\sqrt{2}} e^{i t\dfrac{H}{\hbar}} \vert -\rangle
the summed state represents spin up in z and difference terms represent spin down?
 
Let me introduce a notation to make things clearer:
$$
\hat{S}_z | \pm \rangle_z = \pm \frac{\hbar}{2} | \pm \rangle_z \\
\hat{S}_x | \pm \rangle_x = \pm \frac{\hbar}{2} | \pm \rangle_x
$$
What you are writing is
$$
|\alpha, t \rangle = c_1 e^{-i \hat{H} t / \hbar} | + \rangle_z + c_2 e^{-i \hat{H} t / \hbar} | - \rangle_z
$$
The problem is that ##| + \rangle_z## and ##| - \rangle_z## are not eigenstates of ##\hat{H}## (you should show that). That means that ##e^{-i \hat{H} t / \hbar}## mixes the two spin states, and you can't treat it as a simple complex number. You also cannot easily calculate the exponential of a matrix that is not diagonal.

You therefore need to go to a basis where ##\hat{H}## is diagonal, i.e., a basis of eigenstates of ##\hat{H}##, namely ##| + \rangle_x## and ##| - \rangle_x## (you can show that also). Then you need to take the correct initial state in this basis, look at its time evolution, and if you calculate for instance ##\langle \hat{S}_z \rangle##, you will find that it is time-dependent, hence you will indeed see a precession in the yz plane.
 
So I started over and found the EigenVectors of the hamiltonian at t<T (Interval where B points in X-direction)..
<br /> \mid\alpha\rangle = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \mid +\rangle_{x} e^{\dfrac{\imath e B_{x} t}{2mc}}+ \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \mid -\rangle_{x} e^{\dfrac{-\imath e B_{x} t}{2mc}}\\<br /> Where: \\<br /> \mid +\rangle_{x} =\binom{1}{1}<br /> <br /> \mid -\rangle_{x} =\binom{1}{-1}<br />But I don't know what X is initially, I only know where it is in Z. When I evaluate it for t=0 I get:
<br /> <br /> \mid\alpha, t=0 \rangle = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \mid +\rangle_{x} + \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \mid -\rangle_{x}
Which gives us: //
<br /> \mid\alpha, t=0 \rangle = \binom{1}{0}<br />
Which is the spin up Z ket correct?
So when t -> T
My hamiltonian then changes to B in the Z direction
 
Last edited:
Back
Top