Spinning Super Fluids: Reach Relativistic Speeds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AKatawazi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluids Spinning
AKatawazi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Since there is no friction on a super fluid, can they be spun faster and faster until they reach relativistic speeds? I'm not totally sure the method you would use to spin the fluid, possibly electromagnatism somehow but assuming it were possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Er... how do you propose you get it to spin? It has no viscosity. So if you spin the container it is in, it still won't spin! And this is not a supercurrent, so EM interaction doesn't cut it.

Zz.
 
Well if it was a farafluid it could be spun with electromagnatism right?
 
AKatawazi said:
Well if it was a farafluid it could be spun with electromagnatism right?

A what?

Zz.
 
Well, if you also look at that reference, you would have noticed that it says that a ferrofluid in a magnetic field causes the fluid to polarized along the field. It says nothing about creating any kind of vortices similar to what you get for a supercurrent.

So I still fail to understand why this is relevant here, and how you intend to spin your superfluid.

Zz.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top