A Spinors in dimensions other than 4

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghetti3451
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions Spinors
spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
The Dirac equation describes the behaviour of non-interacting spin-##1/2## fermions in a quantum-field-theoretic framework and is given by

##i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\psi=-m\psi,##

where ##\gamma^{\mu}## are the so-called gamma matrices which obey the Clifford algebra ##\{\gamma^{\mu},\gamma^{\nu}\}=2g^{\mu\nu}## and the spinor ##\psi## is the vector space on which the gamma matrices act. Therefore, the dimension of the gamma matrices fixes the dimension of the spinor.

The spinor ##\psi## that describes spin-##1/2## fermions in this quantum-field-theoretic framework is a ##4##-dimensional vector and the gamma matrices are ##4##-dimensional matrices.The smallest number of dimensions of the gamma matrices that satisfy the Clifford algebra is ##4##. Can we not consider higher-dimensional gamma matrices and corresponding spinors? Are these higher-dimensional spinors at all physical?

What determines the dimensions of the gamma matrices and the spinors?

What are the possible generalisations of the Dirac equation in higher dimensions? Does this involve an increase in the number of gamma matrices?
 
Last edited:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinor#Summary_in_low_dimensions

upload_2016-10-15_17-48-20.png


Also see, http://motls.blogspot.com/2012/04/why-are-there-spinors.html

"Why are there spinors?

Spinors are competitors of vectors and tensors. In other words, they are representations of the orthogonal (rotational) group or the pseudoorthogonal (Lorentz) group, a space of possible objects whose defining property is the very characteristic behavior of their components under these transformations."
 
See e.g. Van Proeyen's Tools for Supersymmetry :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top