Spiral Galaxies and Cyclones: Investigating Their Similarities

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zeynel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxies Spiral
AI Thread Summary
Spiral galaxies and cyclones share a similar spiral shape, but their underlying mechanics differ significantly. The spiral structure in galaxies results from density waves due to stellar orbits, rather than vortex motion. While cyclones are described by fluid dynamics, the equations governing their motion are complex and distinct from those of galaxies. The spirals in galaxies exhibit more intricate structures compared to the simpler forms of weather system cyclones. Understanding these differences is crucial for studying both phenomena effectively.
Zeynel
Messages
43
Reaction score
2
There’s an obvious resemblance between a spiral galaxy and a cyclone. They have the same spiral shape. I was wondering if the equations describing both motion are the same. I googled vortex motion but equations and concepts looked very specialized and complex for me to understand easily. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zeynel said:
They have the same spiral shape.
They 'look' similar but the galaxy shape is not there because of a 'vortex' the lines you see are lines of density due to resonances in all the stellar orbits. There's no cosmic washing machine at work.
 
Great, thanks. I didn’t know that. So how do we compute these resonances? And is there a simple equation giving the motion of an ideal cyclone? Is this covered in fluid dynamics?
 
I really don't know enough about Fluid Dynamics but there are dozens of google links to Cyclones - and also to density waves in galaxies. The two phenomena are very different and the spirals in some galaxies are visibly different in structure from the relatively simple shapes of weather system cyclones.
Happy reading.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top