Split clock signal (provided by oscillator)

AI Thread Summary
To split a clock signal from an oscillator for multiple USB devices, one must consider the need for amplification due to signal degradation after splitting. A digital driver is recommended for signals above 1 MHz to ensure clean rise and fall times, rather than using an operational amplifier in open-loop configuration. If devices have internal oscillators, they would need to be removed to use a shared external clock. Additionally, some devices may have options for external clock configurations that could facilitate this process. Proper implementation is crucial for maintaining synchronization across the devices.
Tom48
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
hi,

i was wondering how its possible to split a clock signal provided by an oscillator in order to use it to drive multiple devices with this one split clock signal.
Let's assume we have a kind of USB device (like an USB stick), that gets its clock signal from an oscillator.
Let's say i would like to provide the same clock signal to multiple USB devices of the same kind (to synchronize them). Would it be possible to take the already build in oscillator out, split the clock signal of this oscillator, amplify it and then provide this clock signal to all devices so they all have the same clock signal?
How would i amplify the clock signal? Could i just use an operational amplifier with no feedback to amplify the clock signal?

At the moment i have no certain device, I am just curious how this could be done?

Thanks a lot!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If the digital clock source (Fosc) is external on the master clocked device then a simple clock buffer chip using that signal will work. Some devices have a internal oscillator with an output pin to drive external devices with a programmed configuration option for a external clock that may not be accessible on a production USB stick.
3.3v device: http://www.ti.com/product/CDCLVC1112
 
nsaspook said:
If the digital clock source (Fosc) is external on the master clocked device then a simple clock buffer chip using that signal will work. Some devices have a internal oscillator with an output pin to drive external devices with a programmed configuration option for a external clock that may not be accessible on a production USB stick.
3.3v device: http://www.ti.com/product/CDCLVC1112
thanks for your reply!
Im indeed talking about devices that all have internal oscillators only.
So i had to remove the internal oscillator from the device first.
After i would clock multiple devices of the same kind with one shared oscillator.
But i guess i first had to amplify the given clock signal somehow in order to clock mutiple devices with it. (because its going to be to weak after the signal split)
Could i just amplify this signal using an omp amp (open loop gain configuration)?

thanks!
 
Tom48 said:
Could i just amplify this signal using an omp amp (open loop gain configuration)?

thanks!

Assuming the clock is a digital signal.
Because of transmission line effects/fanout (current drive capability) and the need for clean,fast rise/fall times on the clock a proper digital driver would be better for any signals greater than maybe 1 MHz.
 
  • Like
Likes Tom48
nsaspook said:
Assuming the clock is a digital signal.
Because of transmission line effects/fanout (current drive capability) and the need for clean,fast rise/fall times on the clock a proper digital driver would be better for any signals greater than maybe 1 MHz.

That depends. Measurements instruments usually use a 10 MHz sine as a external reference signal and will have a "ref in" and "ref out" connector at the back. In precision instruments (which I presume is what we are talking about here, not much point locking several instruments to the same oscillator otherwise) the oscillator is a loop and they can lock to an external reference as long as it is reasonably close to the internal reference.

I don't think I've ever come across a digital clock being used as an external reference (not even in say backplanes of rackmounted equipment); it just seems like an unnecessary complication when you can so easily do clock recovery (and generate a digital clock) from a sinewave
 
  • Like
Likes Tom48 and nsaspook
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top