Split simple polygon into Monotone pieces

  • Thread starter Thread starter christl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polygon Split
christl
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all!
I develop an application in computer science that shows the execution of an Algorithm that triangulates a simple polygon.

The first thing I have to do is to transform the given Polygon into monotone pieces, in order to do that I have to figure out the interior angles of the simple polygon.
I just know the coordinates of the vertices of my polygon.

Now my problem is how I should calculate the interior angle between two edges. And with interior I mean interior of the polygon. Two edges form a triangle which allows me to calculate angles easily but how do I know if I should calculate the exterior or the interior angle of that specific triangle. Is the interior angle of the triangle inside the polygon or the external angle?

Thanks in advance for any answers!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
"Monotone" is an adjective that applies to polynomials, not polygons. What do you mean by "monotone pieces" of a polygon?
 
Thanks. I hadn't seen that use of "monotone" before. However, note that this does not say "monotone pieces" of a polygon or "monotone polygons". It talks about a polygon being "monotone" with respect to a given straight line.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top