I Spontaneous parametric down-conversion entanglement using BBO

Paul159
Messages
15
Reaction score
4
Hello,

I have a question about the creation of the Bell's entanglement state ##1/\sqrt{2} (|HH> + |VV>)##using type I BBO crystals (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_parametric_down-conversion).

Two crystals are put orthogonal to each other and each of them emits a photon pair (##|HH>## or ##|VV>##). Then at the intersection of the two emitted cones we have the Bell's state. But I don't understand why.
Indeed, if I do measurement of the photons with two polarizers, one at 90° and the other 0°, I don't understand why I will have 0 correlation. For me I could detect for example the signal photon of the ##|HH>## state and the idler photon of the ##|VV>##.

I hope my "question" is clear.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Paul159 said:
Two crystals are put orthogonal to each other and each of them emits a photon pair (##|HH>## or ##|VV>##). Then at the intersection of the two emitted cones we have the Bell's state.

Where are you getting this from? Not from the article you linked to; that just talks about producing one photon pair using one crystal.
 
Paul159 said:

Thanks for the reference. It looks to me like the key properties of this setup that allows it to produce the Bell-type state are:

(1) The two crystals act on the two orthogonal polarization components (##H## and ##V##);

(2) The down-conversion processes in each crystal are coherent, so an input photon polarized at 45 degrees (halfway between ##H## and ##V##) will create quantum uncertainty about which crystal is doing the downconversion; this is what creates the Bell-type entangled state.
 
Yes of course, I understand now. Thanks !
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top