SPP at plane interfaces, dispersion curve. confused by textbook?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the dispersion curves for surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) as depicted in "Principles of Nano-Optics" by Novotny and Hecht. Key points include confusion over the phrase "bend back" in relation to the dispersion curve approaching a line, which indicates increasing losses and a transition to the upper branch of the curve. The separation of the two branches throughout k-space raises questions about the "connecting region" mentioned in the text. Additionally, there is a query regarding the physical implications of increased momentum in SPPs due to strong coupling between light and surface charges, with concerns about how dragging electrons would affect momentum. The term "coupling" is questioned in this context, with suggestions that using "resonance" might clarify the concept better. The discussion emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of these phenomena to grasp the behavior of SPPs in relation to their dispersion characteristics.
iLIKEstuff
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
the link below should take you to a google book called "principles of nano-optics" by novotny and hecht. my question is on the dispersion curve plot they have on page 388/389 figure 12.5 and 12.6. it is describing the surface plasmon polaritons. the part i don't get is this excerpt which can be found on page 389 about half way down...

"However, as the disperion curve approaches this line the losses start to increase drastically. As a consequence, as \omega is further increased the dispersion curve bends back and connects to the upper branch." (you'll have to look at page 388 fig 12.5 to see both branches they're talkin about)

the bolded part is the part i don't get. what does "bend back" mean? how is it connecting to the upper brancH? the two lines are separated throughout the whole kspace? can someone explain to me what this is and also where the "connecting region" they mention can be found on the plot?

also, at the bottom of pg 389, it says
"the physical reason for the increased momentum of the SPP is the strong coupling between light and surface charges. the light field has to drag the electrons along the metal surface"
i don't get this either. wouldn't dragging the electron cause it to lose speed? and therefore momentum? i know that momentum here is p = \hbar k but it seems that dragging would cause it to lose momentum. and what does the first sentence mean? what is exactly the meaning/usage of the word coupling in this context? how does coupling allow it to have more momentum?http://books.google.com/books?id=Qr...&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result

thanks guys.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the \varpi coordinate should be normalized, if you want to have a good comprehension. When \varpi increase, it can not obey the SPPs but the free gas plasmons dispersion in upper band.
 
secondly, I do not think dragging is a good term. If you use resonance, you could have a good comprehension. (In my opinion)
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
94
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top