Spring attached to string on one side, mass on the other.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a mass m1 on a frictionless table connected to a spring and a pulley system with mass m2. The main challenge is determining the initial extension of the spring when mass m2 is released. Participants suggest using conservation of energy to analyze the system, noting that the spring remains at its natural length until external forces act upon it. It's emphasized that without friction, the spring will not stretch initially, and m1 will only begin to move once the spring force overcomes static friction. The conversation concludes with a realization that the dynamics of the system are influenced significantly by the absence of friction.
mrdoe
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
This is a problem I came up with myself, so it's not homework and so I didn't post in that forum.

Suppose a mass m1 rests on a frictionless table. m1 is directly connected to a massless ideal spring at equilibrium length of spring constant k which is connected to a string going over a pulley of mass m3 and radius r (and rot. inertia 0.5m3r^2), which is connected after the pulley to a mass m2.

Determine the equation for the motion of mass m1 when m2 is released. (dig. attached).

How would you go about doing this problem? I can't seem to get started because I can't figure out how to find the length the spring will initially be extended.

relevant equations:
F = -kx
Conservation of energy, probably.
All the angular/linear kinematics equations.

edit:sorry reread the rules just then, mods please move this to the homework forum (i thought the restriction didn't apply to independent study)
 

Attachments

  • prob.png
    prob.png
    12.9 KB · Views: 1,106
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi mrdoe! :smile:
mrdoe said:
This is a problem I came up with myself …

Determine the equation for the motion of mass m1 when m2 is released. (dig. attached).

How would you go about doing this problem? I can't seem to get started because I can't figure out how to find the length the spring will initially be extended.

Use conservation of energy.

And since you came up with this problem yourself, I'm surprised you've forgotten that you decided that "The spring is held at equilibrium before mass 2 is released" (in the diagram) … which I assume means that the spring is held at its natural length. :wink:
 
Since it is a frictionless table, the spring will never deform.

Imagine the problem another way: hold m1 over m2 in the air (no pulley), linked by the same string and spring. release them both under acceleration g. What happen? Both fall at the same velocity and the spring never get stretched, because there are no opposite forces.

You need friction to stretch the spring. And, in that case, the equation of motion would be easy since m2 would move while m1 is at rest. m1 will start to move when the spring force will overcome the static friction. At this point, motion of m1 will be the same as motion m2 with the extra distance created by the stretched spring.
 
Thanks, it makes sense now.
Intuitively the initial tug of gravity on mass m2 would stretch the spring and move m1 at the same time, but I guess we live in a world full of friction so that isn't really accurate.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top